Yes because Jake Paul is very bad at soccer
The details from the excerpts that best support the author’s purpose is option D which is In the first excerpt, the author uses narrative techniques and figurative language, while in the second excerpt, the author includes facts to persuade.
<h3>What is an excerpt?</h3>
An excerpt refer to words, phrases or sentences that is deduced or is extracted from a paragraph in a passage or an article which has meaning. From the two excerpts, the author talked about challenges abandoned or children faced on their own without their parents.
Therefore, The details from the excerpts that best support the author’s purpose is option D which is In the first excerpt, the author uses narrative techniques and figurative language, while in the second excerpt, the author includes facts to persuade.
The question is incomplete, below is the completed part gotten from brainly website.
How do details from the excerpts support the author’s purpose?
- In the first excerpt, the author uses facts and statistics, while in the second excerpt, the author uses words that appeal to readers’ emotions.
- In the first excerpt, the author relies on third-person point of view, while in the second excerpt, the author uses first-person point of view.
- In the first excerpt, the author uses words to persuade the reader, while in the second excerpt, the author uses language to entertain the reader.
- In the first excerpt, the author uses narrative techniques and figurative language, while in the second excerpt, the author includes facts to persuade.
Learn more about excerpt below.
brainly.com/question/21400963
#SPJ1
I believe the correct answer from the choices listed above is option B. The compound subject in the sentence above would be Budd Abbott and Lou Coastelle. <span>When a sentence has two or more </span>subjects, that's called a “compound subject<span>.” Hope this answers the question.</span>