<span>A. They both attempted to preserve the
Union. Both compromise sought to satisfy both pro-slavery and anti-slavery
factions in government. Both sought to find ways to ensure that there was a
balance between the two sides. The
Kansas-Nebraska Act however, destroyed that balance and later led to Civil War.</span>
Spain quite possibly? i looked it up and that's what i'm getting, hope it helps.
Answer:
Option B. share-croppers is the answer
Explanation:
Social tensions and schism was seen in between people based on their color, race and ethnicities. African Americans were taken as share croppers or the tenant farmers.
Jim Crow laws came into existence which prohibited racial discrimination in the public place. Plessey and Ferguson case lead to the amendment of constitution which stated ‘separate but equal doctrine’ which itself inwardly violates the law of equality.
The right to poll or contest in election was not granted and this made the African Americans to migrate to north. Many protests were demonstrated to express their apprehension over ethnic discrimination.
Any choices? If there inst then it would be because they had a source of water and that helped expand territory
<span />
Answer:
Im pretty sure its buisnesses will make more money because they laid of a worker meaning not as much pay
Explanation:
