By comparing the frequency of forecasts coming true to what would be predicted by pure chance, one can evaluate the astrology used by individuals who cast predictive horoscopes.
Since the 18th century, astrology has been recognized as a collection of divinatory techniques that make claims about being able to learn details about human affairs and terrestrial events by observing the apparent locations of celestial objects.
Since at least the second millennium BCE, several societies have used various forms of astrology. These practices have their roots in calendrical systems, which were used to forecast seasonal changes and interpret celestial cycles as signals of divine communications.
Learn more about astrology brainly.com/question/2438361?
#SPJ4
Marcus is most likely enrolled in a psychology course if she is dealing with behaviors and mental health.
<h3>What is psychology?</h3>
This is a field of study that is mostly concerned with the study of human behavior and also the study of the mental health of and how the mind works.
Given that the mental health and behavior is being studied by Marcus, she is obviously enrolled in a psychology class.
Read more on psychology here:
brainly.com/question/12011520
Answer:
The waste and water crisis facing a growing Sydney. Waste, water security and climate change are the big environmental challenges facing Sydney as we gain an extra 1.3 million people over the next decade
Explanation:
so sorry im late i will try to catch up faster next time alright
Answer:
b. Social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.
Explanation:
Social consensus can be defined as a principle or theory which is used to distinguish between what is deemed good or bad in the behavior of the people living in a society.
On the other hand, the magnitude of consequences refers to the overall harm or benefit that is associated with an ethical decision chosen by an individual or group of people.
The difference between social consensus and magnitude of consequences is that social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.