Answer:
In his speech, President Obama said that poverty and hopelessness do not cause terrorism, but they cause resentment that terrorist groups use to recruit people. He also says that when governments deny human rights to people, or when their governments treat them like terrorists, people might turn to terrorist groups.
Explanation:
sample answer
The way to achieve this impartiality – to free judges to decide cases based on what the law actually requires, and on nothing else – is to ensure that the judiciary is independent, or, put differently, not subject to reprisals for decisions on the bench.
But judicial independence is not an absolute or singular value defining our courts. The principle of judicial restraint is equally important – and it is inextricably linked to judicial independence. At one level, the tension between the two seems inescapable. But there is an important sense in which an independent judiciary and judicial restraint are flip sides of the same coin. Both aim to minimize the influence of extraneous factors on judicial decision-making. A judge must not decide a case with an eye toward public approbation, because whether a particular result is popular is irrelevant to whether it is legally sound. In the same way, a judge must not consult
Explonatian: (001f0n7.0r9
Answer: both led to a loss of civil liberties for colonists
Explanation:
The Writs of Assistance allowed British colonial customs officers in Colonial America to enforce trade laws by being able to search any ship or house that they suspected might be harboring smuggled goods.
The Quartering Acts were laws that made it the responsibility of local governments in Colonial America to feed and shelter British soldiers which led to British soldier sometimes sleeping in people's houses.
Both these Acts led to the loss of civil liberties for the colonists who had to allow the British into their homes at the behest of the British.