<span>semantic fallacy
</span>
A “slam dunk” argument is likely the product of a fallacious syllogism. The word “slam dunk” has actually originated from the basketball games. This word is used to show people a forceful move in the game of basketball. The player puts the ball in the basket with full power and force. It is often considered a dramatic shot in the game. In literary sense, the word can be used to express violent actions as well. It can also be used to describe a vicious fight among individuals. <span> </span>
This part of the speech is effective since it conveys Britain's confidence in their Navy and the possibility of winning the war, as further explained below.
<h3>What is the purpose of the speech?</h3>
The speech "Their Finest Hour" by Winston Churchill has the purpose of conveying the idea that it is possible for Britain to win the war. For that reason, the part of the speech that we are analyzing here is effective. It implies that the British Navy deserves to be trusted, whereas Italy's and Germany's are not as good they they used to be.
Therefore, this part of the speech helps compose the speech as whole and serves as another point or argument in the process of claiming that Britain can win the war. The speech is, thus, inspiring and reassuring, as is its purpose.
With the information above in mind, we can conclude that the answer provided above is correct.
Learn more about purpose here:
brainly.com/question/10336721
#SPJ1
Max is a boy who is a slow learner, and Kevin is a brilliant boy who has Morquio Syndrome, a dangerous form of dwarfism. The two develop a close friendship, and spend time together.
Max's father is a notorious criminal who is serving time in prison. Max learns his dad, Kenny, will be released on parole, Kevin has a seizure in the school cafeteria.
Kevin has another seizure on his birthday, goes to the hospital, and eventually dies.
Answer:
The answer is shaking; that's the participle in this sentence.
