Answer
This late Victorian alphabet, written and illustrated by Mary Frances Ames (writing as Mrs. Ernest Ames), aims to teach young Britons their ABCs — along with a veneration for military might, empire, and colonialism. At the end of the 19th century, the British Empire was nearing the zenith of its empire and territorial holdings. With unchallenged naval superiority, Britain extended formal control over India and large swaths of Africa, as well as indirect economic control over many more nations. That global hegemony is celebrated in this children’s book, with racist illustrations of tiger hunts in India, “naughty” Africans in chains, and fearsome displays of military power to excite the next generation of conquerors. It also includes classic British icons such as roast beef and unicorns.
Explanation:
What did our Victorian forebears think of their country, the empire, the army and navy, the life they led and, of course, their beloved Queen? Hundreds of mighty tomes have been written about the great colonial years when Britain ruled the waves but perhaps none summed it up so succinctly as this ABC for Baby Patriots first published in 1899. Was it written to instil patriotic and imperial values into children? After all, the great Empire builder Cecil Rhodes had said 'Remember that you are an Englishman and have consequently won first prize in the lottery of life'; or was it a disapproving tongue in cheek comment on jingoism? You must judge for yourself. Either way it provides an extraordinary view of the Victorian values and attitudes that made Britain great.
Answer:
Karl Marx was a man with crazy ideas, ut he was not an advocate of mass murder or of one party dictatorships.
Both Lenin+Stalin (and Trotsky) were primitive gangsters who believed mass murder was the best way to achieve Utopia. Marx didn’t believe this.Thus I guess he would have opposed the sickening crimes commited in his name.
A. Mongols i'm pretty sure! :D
Answer:
Ｉ ｔｈｉｎｋ Ｕｎｉｔｅｄ Ｓｔａｔｅｓ ｓｅｎｔ ｔｏ ｂｏｓｎｉａ ｂｅｃａｕｓｅ Ｕｎｉｔｅｄ Ｓｔａｔｅｓ ｗａｎｔ ｔｏ ｈｅｌｐ Ｂｏｓｎｉａ ｉｎ ｔｈｅ ｍｉｄ - １９９０..
It demonstrates it because they were sentenced to an electric chair even though the evidence and the case was highly controversial. The evidence was inconsistent and it was a murder and a robbery that they committed which under normal circumstances would not have such a severe punishment. However, they were considered to be anarchy radicals and extremists in so the red scare helped the case punish them much more severely.
