The answer is D, which is storming of the Bastille in an attempt to overthrow and attack the monarchy.
D. that she may profit from the building project
Look at the evidence within the question information. The author has 20 years of experience in construction and owns a local construction company. So if the city or town is considering a building initiative that will cost the town millions of dollars, the author of the editorial quite possibly hopes to bid for some of that construction work. It would be very good for her business.
Now, the fact that a construction company owner favors the building initiative doesn't mean her views should be rejected simply because of her position in the construction industry. If her views are valid and provide solid arguments in favor of the project, those views should be considered on their merits. At the same time, perspectives from other local citizens should be considered too, in terms of environmental impact of the project, costs and affordability, how the building initiative will benefit residents of the community, etc.
Answer:
Finding a permanent solution to ruined harvest and mass famines
Explanation:
What Egypt could have done differently to save itself from decline is "finding a permanent solution to ruined harvest and mass famines."
This is because the major reason that is attributed to the fall of the Egyptian Empire are the following:
1. Great disparity in wealth between the aristocrats and the lower class
2. Constant war from neigboring city states
3. Culture and religion from other states.
Hence, to solve these issues, is to have a stable economy that is sustainable. And to have a sustainable economy is to ensure the city state or nation can feed itself well all the times, regardless of the climate change.
However, ancient Egypt struggled to maintain their economic growth which rest mainly on agriculture due to change in climate that effect their agricultural produce.
Therefore, in this case, the correct answer is "finding a permanent solution to ruined harvest and mass famines."
Answer: It would reduce Chinese exports
Explanation:
This is in relation to the 35% tax that the Obama administration slapped on Chinese tires.
China is able to produce tires at a cheaper rate then the United States so when they export these tires to the U.S., they sell for a cheaper rate which makes people buy them more.
With an increase in the taxes on them, the tires would become more expensive for U.S. consumers so they will buy less Chinese tires. This will lead to the Chinese companies that make tires selling less and having to reduce production which would lead to them having to fire people.
I believe your answer is "<span>They valued The enlightenment ideals of freedom in and individual rights."
Hope this helps! </span>
