Answer:
There is no cause for concern because human population growth is not correlated with the global ecological footprint.
Explanation:
The methodology of the ecological footprint is very wrong in that that it ignores the growth of the human population. The human population is not static in its numbers, and over the past century it increased significantly. Despite the slower growth nowadays, the population is still going up, and each individual should be taken into consideration for the ecological footprint because everyone has influence over it. If this is totally ignored, than the results and projections will be very misguiding and wrong, so it is an issue that has to be addressed so that the problem can be solved on the basis on correct and reliable data.
The answer is Johannesburg from south Africa
Hope this helps:)
Plz mark me brainliest
Answer: Free market economy, or just a market economy
Explanation:
<span>The populations are already sparse (due to being mainly desert) added to the fact that there is a huge influx of people seeking work oppotunities in the oil industry, from Westerners to Asian communities. This swamps the local population. </span>
Explanation:
Rocks can be classified in to three main groups - igneous, sedimentary and metamorphic. These three different rock types can be found in distinct areas of the UK. Igneous rocks - these rocks are a result of volcanic activity in the past, when Britain was close to a plate boundary.