Answer:
Needs - $284.79, Wants - $170.87, Savings - $113.92
Explanation:
Just divide $569.58 in half, so $284.79 for needs.
Then, $569.58 * 0.30 = $170.87 for wants.
Lastly, $569.58 * 0.20 = $113.92 for savings.
To check your answer, add up all the amounts:
$284.79 + $170.87 + $113.92 = $569.58
Answer:
Built-in gains tax is $13,020
.
Explanation:
The built-in gains tax is one levied against an S corporation that used to be a C corporation, or received assets from a C corporation.
Here,
Gain= $80,000
Loss= $10,000
Holds= $8,000
Income= $65,000
Corporate tax= 21%
To calculate the built-in gains tax, we will need to calculate the net gain of the corporation and multiply it by the tax rate.
= Built-in-gain - built-in-loss - unexpired NOL
80,000 - 10,000 - 8,000 = 62,000
Then
62,000 x 0.21 tax rate = 13,020
= 13,020
It is D. There are 12 months in a year and she needs to save atleast 9,000.
600x12=7,200
350x24=8,400
225x36=8,100
200x48=9,600
A settlement made with the aid of using a minor is frequently voidable, however a minor can most effective keep away from a settlement all through his or her minority popularity and for an inexpensive time after he reaches the age of majority. After an inexpensive length of time, the settlement is deemed to be ratified and cannot be avoided.
- Facts of the case: Sean, 17, a snowboarder, signs a long-term endorsement agreement for sportswear. At age 19, he wants to void the agreement by claiming that he lacked capacity when he signed the deal at 17.
- Rule of Law: Minor's Contracts are voidable at the option of Minor.
- Analysis: Since, Minor's Contract is voidable at the option of the Minor who Signs the Contact can either honor the contract or void the contract. A minor can void a contract for lack of capacity, only when he is still under the age of majority. If a minor turn 18 i.e., After attaining Majority and hasn't done anything to void the contract, then the contract can no longer be voided.
- Here, Sean has not done anything to void the contract on attaining the age of 18. So, he at the age of 19, cannot void the agreement by claiming that he lacked capacity when he signed the agreement at 17.
- Decision: Sean Vs. Sportswear Company: In the light of the above provisions, a Court will not permit Sean to now void the agreement.
Learn more about minority popularity here:
brainly.com/question/14457086
#SPJ4
Answer:
C. The Cassies will win.
Explanation:
In the given case, the cassies would win as this was appraisal fraud that done by the company employee who is a Bank of america Subsidiary. Here the loan broker and the appraiser increase the fair market value of cassies home i.e. $620,000 but it would be lesser that is $250,000. So this inflate the value in order to make the payment of high rate with related to the mortgage
