Answer:
D.
Explanation:
The Magna Carta introduced the idea of writing human rights into law.
The most known principle of the Magna Carta was that the monarchy had agreed to limit their power, that they were not above the law and couldn't "bully" everyone else below them. Although this was not entirely effective, it was a turning point.
The Magna Carta is the origin of some points for Bills of Rights in many modern day countries. (A Bill of Right is a list of rights granted to a state's citizens.)
The theory of natural law was a vital part of the enlightenment as evidenced by the writings of Grotius, Locke, and Pufendorf in the seventeenth century and Vattel and Burlamaqui in the eighteenth.
Mary II
ascended the English throne as
a joint monarch after accepting
the Bill of Rights
The decision by the Marshall court was highlighting <span>the "necessary and proper" clause of Article I, Section 8, of the United States Constitution.
After enumerating a number of the powers of Congress, including borrowing money, coining money, regulating commerce, etc, Section 8 of Article I closes with by saying Congress shall have power "t</span><span>o make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."
The statement of the Marshall court in regard to the chartering of a national bank held significance beyond that issue as well. The ruling said: "L</span><span>et the ends be legitimate, let it be within the scope of the Constitution, and all means which are appropriate, which are plainly adopted to that end, which are not prohibited, but consist with the letter and spirit of the Constitution, are constitutional." The quoted section which you have above also displays this principle that asserts a "loose constructionist" view of the Constitution is embedded in the Constitution's own wording as "necessary and proper."</span>