The economic value of having colonies in the first place was for 3 main reasons
1) attain cheap labour from the native peoples
2) acquire cheap raw materials to bring to the homeland (Europe)
3) open up new markets to trade with
the first two were vital in Britains industrial revolution. Without cheap raw materials, and cheap labourers, the factories and refineries in Britain would have costed far more to maintain and keep supplied. This, in turn, would have slowed down production considerably. There is no doubt in my mind that the industrial revolution would still have taken place in Britain with or without the colonies, but WITH the colonies the process was sped up considerably.
Overall, cheap labour and raw materials attained through Britains colonial interests sped up the industrialisation of the UK.
Answer:
I'm sorry-that must be really hard. If you need anyone to talk to I'm never really doing anything. Just know that you deserve better than anyone that decides to leave. Especially people that are supposed to be there for you.
<span>The U.S. had many women employed at the end of the 1940's due to World War II and as the troops returned from overseas, not all were able to return to the workforce which encouraged women to continue in the labor market at that time. This trend was encouraged through the 1950's to ensure a robust workforce at home as many men were either fighting in the Korean war or unable to return to the workforce still after World War II.</span>
Hey there W22carterr,
Who proposed the Albany plan of Union to increase corporation among 13 colonies?
Answer:
Benjamin Franklin proposed the Albany Plan Of Union in 1754.
Hope this helps :D
<em>~Danielle♥</em>
