If General Contracting is sued by Rockville for refusing to complete the job, General Contracting can have the contract discharged on an impracticability basis.
<h3>What would make a contract impractical?</h3>
When parties to a contract agree to a contract that based on normal circumstances and due course, and one party discovers that they cannot complete the contract based on unforeseen circumstances, the contact can be ruled impractical.
General Contracting could not foresee the solid granite foundation and so they could not have known they would pay so much to complete the project. The contract can therefore be impracticable.
Find out more on impracticable contracts at brainly.com/question/10160005.
Answer:
The correct anwer is B. real-options perspective.
Explanation:
They are known as Real Options to the possibilities that some projects have to introduce, in the future, modifications in productive investments thus increasing their value. In practice, managers often refer to these options as intangibles.
The classic models of valuation of investment projects based on the discount of cash flows (NPV, IRR), do not incorporate in the project valuation the possibility of introducing modifications, so that the total value of the project is increased. Therefore, the non-consideration of these modification options may undervalue investment projects by not considering aspects that may be strategic for the company and cause it to discard projects that it should undertake.
The existence of Real Options increases the value of an investment project. In this way, the value of the total project can be calculated as the value of the project without the option (NPV) plus the value of the option.
Answer:
Katie Kwasi's Utility Function
The units of x1 that she will consume after the change in income is:
= 40 units of x1
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Katie Kwasi’s utility function, U(x1, x2) = 2(ln x1) + x2
Current consumption = 10 units of x1 and 15 units of x2
When her income doubles, with prices staying constant, Katie will consume:
= 2(2 * 10 of x1) + 15 of x2
= 40 units of x1 + 15 units of x2
Therefore, she will consume 40 units of x1 and 15 units of x2
b) The above function expresses mathematically Katie's utility to be a function of the units of x1 and x2 that she can consume, given her income constraint. If her income doubles, Katie will consume double units of x1 and the same units of x2 as she was consuming before the change in income.
