If a policy change causes a Pareto improvement, is the outcome necessarily Pareto efficient if a policy change causes a Pareto improvement, then the outcome is not necessarily Pareto efficient this is because another change in the policy could cause another Pareto improvement.
A Pareto development is a development of a device whilst an alternative in the allocation of goods harms no person and advantages as a minimum one character. Pareto enhancements also are called "no-brainers" and are generally predicted to be rare, due to the plain and effective incentive to make any available Pareto development.
Factors that lie within the PPF display an inefficient or below-usage of resources – this is Pareto inefficient. A Pareto development way that output of both products can increase as we move from inside the PPF to factors at the PPF boundary.
Learn more about Pareto here:
brainly.com/question/7304310
#SPJ4
Answer:
c. I, II, and III only
Explanation:
As we know that
Free cash flow = Earnings before Interest and Taxes × (1-Tax Rate) + Amortization and Depreciation expense - Change in Net Working Capital -Capital Expenditure
And, the Net income is determined after considering all cash and non cash expenses.
Therefore, I, II and III statements are considered
Hence, the option c is correct
Answer:
The budgeted variable overhead for May is $5,335
The budgeted variable overhead for June is $7,260
The budgeted fixed overhead for both May and June is $11,500 per month
Explanation:
First we have to determine how many tricycles does Becker Bikes expects to manufacture during May and June:
May:
beginning inventory May 180
expected sales May 520
ending inventory May 145
Becker is planning to manufacture 485 tricycles (= 520 + 145 -180)
June:
beginning inventory May 145
expected sales May 650
ending inventory May 155
Becker is planning to manufacture 660 tricycles (= 650 + 155 -145)
The budgeted variable overhead for May = 485 tricycles x $11 per tricycle = $5,335
The budgeted variable overhead for June = 660 tricycles x $11 per tricycle = $7,260
The fixed overhead for both May and June is $11,500 per month
Answer:
During the recession of 2008 through 2010, Ford saw sales of its vehicles drop and was forced to reduce production. This decision reflected changes in the company's ECONOMIC environment.
Explanation:
The automotive industry crises occurred from 2008 to 2010, it was basically a part of the financial crisis that started in 2007. It also effected most of the Europe, but the results in America were far worst than any other part of the world. The main reason behind it was the rise in the fuel prices for these vehicles. As Ford didn't offer much fuel efficient models for costumers, their sales started to decline, which resulted in the reduction of production, and changed the companies economic environment.
Answer:
Answer A = $9,000
Answer B = $6,400
Answer C = $7,632
Answer D = $54,000
Answer E = $71,063
Explanation:
[ find attachments for complete solutions]
Note: Complete question is attached to the attachment section
