1. Gives
2.teaches
3.brings
4. Wore
5.controls
6.starts
7. Do, Believe
8.works
9.opens
10.makes
11.watches
12. Brush
I know all the answers but try to do the rest yourself
Because all saints day the christian Halliday on nov first
Answer:
In the final chapter, Jekyll's letter highlights one of the main themes of the novel, the dual nature of man. It is this concept that caused him to pursue his disastrous experiments that led to his downfall. Hyde, the personification of Jekyll's purely evil characteristics, revels in the freedom of an anonymous existence. Although he successfully distills his evil side, Jekyll still remains a combination of good and evil. Thus, when transforming back and forth, his evil side grows stronger and more powerful after years of repression, and is able to take over completely. In this way, Jekyll's experiments are the opposite of what he hoped. Interestingly, as is repeatedly mentioned throughout the novel, Hyde is a small man often called dwarfish, while Jekyll is a man of large stature. Thus, the reader is left to assume that Jekyll's evil side is much weaker and less developed than his good side. However, appearances can be deceiving. In fact, Hyde's strength far out powers Jekyll's.
In his letter, Jekyll clearly states that he felt no guilt about Hyde's actions, as "Henry Jekyll stood at times aghast before the acts of Edward Hyde, but the situation was apart from ordinary laws, and insidiously relaxed the grasp of conscience. It was Hyde, after all, and Hyde alone, that was guilty." To the reader, this explanation seems ridiculous, because Hyde is in fact part of Jekyll, and a being that Jekyll created. Therefore, clearly Jekyll is responsible for the man's actions.
Explanation:
The correct answer is C. Challenging assumptions
Explanation:
A discussion technique refers to different methods that guarantee the discussion is effective or guarantees the exchange of ideas between the participants flows. Common discussion techniques include asking questions, guiding the discussion, stating opposing ideas, challenging assumptions, among others. In the case of challenging assumptions, this discussion technique focuses on re-examining carefully through questions the assumptions or ideas already stated in order to consider them from a different perspective and determine if they are valid or have been just wrongly assumed.
Consider Jennifer is mainly asking questions about the ideas of Daniel in order to make him reconsider ideas from a different perspective it can be concluded she is mainly using challenging assumptions technique in order to challenge the ideas previously assumed about the title of the work. Therefore, in this conversation, the discussion technique Jennifer most clearly shows is challenging assumptions.
