Answer:
The correct answer is: Congress accused president Johnson of abusing his presidential powers, and Johnson thought that congress overstepped its authority in carrying out <u>radical reconstruction</u>.
Explanation:
After Abraham Lincoln was killed, in 1865, Andrew Johnson was elected as the president of the U.S. Shortly after that, he started with his plan for the South’s reconstruction. When the Congress met to evaluate the situation, one of the assumptions was that President Johnson was overstepping his boundaries, as the Republicans thought the reconstruction of the South was not his job, but the job of the Congress.
Congress made a plan to distribute the land between freedmen and create schools, but this bill was vetoed by President Johnson. He said this was a violation of the separation of powers, as he considered it expensive and unconstitutional.
Answer:
Delegates from each of the Thirteen Colonies met in Philadelphia in the summer of 1776 to decide the case for liberty. The goal was to convince the States that the time had come for the United Colonies to declare their independence from Mother England.
Explanation:
i hope this helps
Answer:
A
In Ancient Greece, the Mycenaeans made huge advances in engineering and architecture and had a written language. Their society collapsed for unknown reasons in 1100 BCE
Answer:
The phrase means that European powers should leave the continent, allow Africans to become independent nations and refrain from interfering in their economy. It was a claim similar to the Monroe Doctrine: Africans don't interfere in Europe, Europeans shouldn't interfere with Africa.
Answer:
Russia benefits of NATO is discussed below in details.
Explanation:
- For more than two decades, NATO has struggled to form a connection with Russia, promoting discussion and effective participation in sectors of mutual interest.
- Association has been suspended since 2014 in answer to Russia’s armed intrusion in Ukraine but political and military ways of expression remain accessible.
- Concern about Russia’s continued destabilizing design of military exercises and offensive discourse goes well beyond Ukraine.
