I believe the answer is: A microhistorian might document one day in a town that experienced particularly high unemployment levels, while a comparative historian might graph unemployment levels in several cities throughout the Great Depression.
Microhistorian tend to choose that method because they tend to favour a more intensive research within smaller unit of research (such as villages, small neighbourhood, etc). Comparative historian on the other hand, might choose that method because they favour research technique that collect as many data as possible from one segment of historical period and compared it with the another.
This would probably be the Vikings. Leif Erikson and his men, but their settlement was not permanent. So your answer could be Christopher Columbus. It depends on what your looking for.<span />
Answer:
any of the world's main continuous expanses of land (Africa, Antarctica, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America, South America).
Explanation:
This is the definition in the dictionary
Answer:
The right answer is:
c. Wealthy merchants who could spur economic growth in the colonies.
Explanation:
In the 18th century, Great Britain administered its colonies under a system or mercantilism that aimed at the economic benefit of the metropolis. By mid-century, there was a society with increased living standards and rising demands of comfort and new consumer products that reflected social status. Constant exploration, new settlements and trade provided new economic opportunitities. At some moment, beyond the traditional settlement of poor immigrants from the British islands and other parts of Europe, the colonial authorities encouraged the migration of rich people to take advantage of opportunities of growing trade and in farming in new lands.
Answer:
because salted meat could last a long time
Explanation:
