What statement is true of working women in the early 1900s?

History

2 answers:

Hatshy [7]3 years ago

8 0

Answer: D

Explanation: It was thought that women were inferior to men so they were not paid as much.

tino4ka555 [31]3 years ago

4 0

Hello there!

Answer: D

Hope this helps :)

You might be interested in

Which dispora took the jews to what is now modern-day Turkey?

Anna35 [415]

The answer is Babylonian hope i helped

7 0

3 years ago

List 5 ways that women’s lives have changed since gaining suffrage in 1920

algol [13]

Answer:

A. Ability to vote

B. More educational opportunities

C. Higher wages

D. Better career opportunities

E. Increased involvement in religious activities

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Choose one of the following names and write a well-developed paragraph about one of these person's role in the American Revoluti

LuckyWell [14K]

Answer:

3. Friedrich Von Stueben

Explanation:

During the early stages of the revolution, the Continental Army had a reputation for being disorganized, undisciplined and poorly drilled. That started to change in early 1778, when the extravagantly named Friedrich Wilhelm Ludolf Gerhard Augustin, the Baron von Steuben, arrived to assist the patriots. The Baron was a former Prussian military officer who had once served on the staff of Frederick the Great. Though prone to exaggeration—he wore flashy uniforms and styled himself a lieutenant general even though he had never risen above the rank of captain—he also possessed a keen military mind. Upon arriving at George Washington’s winter encampment at Valley Forge, he introduced new sanitation measures and gave the troops a crash course in 18th century military tactics that included bayonet combat and more effective techniques for firing and reloading muskets.

6 0

3 years ago

How did the economic context of peru impact the decisions made in the tintaya mine endeavor?

KengaRu [80]

The explorations that led to the discovery of Tintaya mine go back to 1917. In 1971, the Peruvian government promoted the exploitation of the mine. In 1980, the expropriation of approximately 4,000 hectares of land, owned by the communities, was carried out. It is for this reason that started a dispute between the commoners and the Company. In 1985 the exploitation of Tintaya began and it became the third producer of the country. In 1994, the mine was bought by Broken Hill Proprietary (BHP), who subsequently merged with the company Billiton, forming the second biggest group in the world production of minerals. In 2001, the first proposal for the framework agreement was made public. An agreement was reached and the framework agreement was consolidated in 2003. The signature of the framework agreement was an innovative milestone. Never before, a mining company had agreed to transfer a percentage of profits to communities and to engage to dialogue with them at all times. In 2005, a violent takeover occurred of the Tintaya facilities. A reformulation of the framework agreement was demanded. The implementation of the framework agreement was taking place very slowly. The president of BHP Billiton had to suspend the mining activity until a new agreement was reached. Then the negotiations began again. Xstrata Cooper (now Glencore) bought Tintaya from BHP Billiton in 2006. The owner changed, but the same conflicts and mobilizations continued until 2012. The last stoppage lasted eight days. During this paralysis, violent acts occurred and even the mine was asked to close, which was completely rejected by the government. Finally, at present, no resolution or reformulation of the framework agreement has been reached.

3 0

3 years ago

Equilibrium theory appeals to some sociologists because it explains a. How core nations interact with peripheral nations. B. Why

Lana71 [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

took test

5 0

2 years ago