All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following statements is true regarding the impact the fur trade had on american Indians?

History

1 answer:

Neporo4naja [7]3 years ago

4 0

Question 1:

Answer: b) Many tribes became dependent on the items that the europeans were trading.

While colonialism brought enormous conflict between colonists and Native tribes, they also cooperated to a large extent. One of the main examples is that of trade. Trade gave both the colonists and the Natives objects they could not themselves produce. Some tribes became very dependent on some items, such as guns, horses and textiles.

Question 2:

Answer: c) Horses.

Different Indian tribes had different lifestyles, and they were affected to a different extent by new European items. However, in the case of Plains Indians, horses completely altered their way of living. Having gotten their first horses from Spanish settlers, they became outstanding horsemen. Horses also fitted their nomadic way of life, being very useful for hunting (in particular buffalo) and for moving across large territories.

You might be interested in

What religions did the aryans help shape

diamong [38]

When the Aryans moved into what is today India from Europe they had an elaborate religion and religious texts. After settling in India their religion developed into Hinduism.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How old is the United States? (2022)

sattari [20]

Answer:The simple answer is that as of the July 4, 2022, the United States is 246 years old.

Explanation:

3 0

1 year ago

From Gettysburg; The Turning Point of the Civil War

Akimi4 [234]

Answer:

1. What does General Longstreet say about the enemy when he speaks with General Lee?

That the enemy was anxious.

At that time, Longstreet managed to surround the enemy's capital. The enemy was aware of this and heightened their defense because they're expecting an attack. Longstreet believed that at that time it's better to not lose cool and wait. Anxiety tend to resulted in mistakes and that's when they should strike the enemy.

2. Why doesn’t General Sam Hood want to take the hill?

Basically because the enemy had an advantageous position in the high ground. During gun fights, having high ground were extremely beneficial since it made your troops became harder to be hit.

Sam hood believed that the troops did not have enough numbers to override this disadvantages, so he didn't really want to risk it.

3. Colonel Chamberlain’s men are the end of the line of the Union army. What would happen if Colonel Chamberlain’s men retreated?

At that time, Colonel Chamberlain and his men had the role to hold the enemy's line and distract them. While the distraction occured, other unites of the army will flank the enemy from the side and took over the high ground.

If Chamberlain retreated, the enemy wouldn't be distracted and they could see the flank far before it came. This would made it impossible for the union to took the high ground.

4. What did Colonel Chamberlain do when his men ran out of ammunition?

After they ran out of ammunition, Colonel Chamberlain used bayonets and charge down into the two Alabama regiments. Bayonet is a knife that attached to the edge of your gun. So it kind of acting like a spear.

At that time, Chamberlain believed that his unit should hold the line at all cost in order for the union to achieve victory. Even though melee attacks was risky, he believed that it's worth the sacrifice.

8 0

2 years ago

What is one of the primary reasons for the collapse of socialist/communist economic systems, particularly in the soviet union?

11Alexandr11 [23.1K]

A. Government failure to distribute resources effectively.

Although the foundation of a socialist/ communist nation is that of distribution of wealth equitably, governments, like the Soviet Union, failed to ensure just that. Due to lack of poor decisions and corruption, a large gap started to form between the rich (bourgeoise) and the poor (proletariat). Thus, a mass struggle ensued, which in turn resulted in the collapse of the system.

5 0

3 years ago

What was the agenda of the souther Democratic Party

Len [333]

Answer:

The agenda for southern democratic party is "Majority, Modern liberalism, Social liberalism Factions, Centrism, Conservatism, Democratic socialism, Left-wing populism, Progressivism, Social democracy."

Explanation:

Modern liberalism in the United States is the leading form of liberalism in the United States. It associates with the thoughts of public freedom and parity with care for communal impartiality and a diverse economy. According to Ian Adams, all American parties are "liberal and always have been.

Social liberal government is expected to address economic and social issues such as poverty, health care, education and the climate using government intervention whilst also emphasizing the rights and autonomy of the individual.

Centrism is a political outlook or specific position that involves acceptance or support of a balance of a degree of social equality and a degree of social hierarchy, while opposing political changes which would result in a significant shift of society strongly to either the left or the right.

Liberal conservatism is a political ideology combining conservative policies with liberal stances, especially on economic, social and ethical issues, or a brand of political conservatism strongly influenced by liberalism.

Democratic socialism is defined as having a socialist economy in which the means of production are socially and collectively owned or controlled, alongside a democratic political system of government.

Left-wing populism, or social populism, is a political ideology that combines left-wing politics and populist rhetoric and themes.

Progressivism is a political philosophy in support of social reform. It is based on the idea of progress in which advancements in science, technology, economic development and social organization are vital to the improvement of the human condition.

Social democracy is a political, social and economic philosophy that supports economic and social interventions to promote social justice within the framework of a liberal democratic polity and a capitalist-oriented economy.

3 0

3 years ago