<u>The correct answer is A. What proof the tipster is able to provide.</u>
The reason why it's anonymous is probably because <em>the person providing the information doesn't feel comfortable providing their identity</em>. That's why we have so many tip lines that assure us we won't be asked for our names, information about where we live or even how we know what we know. All they care about is the information we provide and the accuracy of it.
Hence the correct answer can't be C or D. Just imagine what would happen to the tipster if they are quoted or exposed. They want the crime to stop but they don't want to be harmed for being the people talking about it.
In order to stop the crime or expose it, it is<u><em> necessary</em></u> for the reporter to have <em>concrete evidence</em> of it. Without proof, the reporter won't be able to check if the tip is true. His reputation is also undermined if what he publishes turns out to be fake, so proof is very important.
Answer B it's also incorrect because the <em>intention </em>of the tipster should be <em>irrelevant</em>. Also by stating why they want to talk, they'd be revealing who they are to the criminals (or at least give them an idea) and they wouldn't remain anonymous anymore.
You need to remove the colon
Answer:
Bradbury wrote this essential dystopian novel describing what would be the main threat to the future of culture: in the future censorship will reach the status of unnecessary if we can make no one bother to inquire, to worry about challenging their thoughts. In opening a book.
For many, this text is correct as a predictor of the contradictions of the modern era: in times in which the social mass is so plural, the media are more careful than ever to transmit messages that do not offend anyone, so they bet on a lowest common denominator that ends up suppressing the plurality of ideas and the development of knowledge. A radically anti-intellectual culture.
He wants the reader to be able to perceive this and not let technology consume it entirely. That he inquires and questions things.
Answer:
More often than not, advertisements aimed at teenagers are effective. Simply because in the youthful ages, our brains are more easily persuaded. However, most advertisements are not ethical because they convince teens that they need to be everything but exactly who they are to be liked....... hope this helps!!
Please mark brainliest
