It would be the principle of "judicial review" that guides the courts' interpretation of the civil liberties found in the Bill of Rights, since this allows the court to determine if a law is violating these rights in any way.
<span>I believe it was Korea.</span>
The constitution was designed to be flexible so new laws can be added as needed and old laws can be re-interpreted.
In politics this is being "radical" is considered being extreme
Put an attachment so we can help you.
