Answer:
Statement that best explains the difference in viewpoint in the Greenberg interview from that in the informational text on Thurgood Marshall is Option D: The Greenberg interview provides an insider's view of the Brown vs. Board of Education case; the perspective of the informational article is more distant.
Explanation:
Brown v. Board of Education case was a decision which set benchmark in Supreme Court of U.S. It ruled that the state laws which establish racial discrimination in public schools are unconstitutional.
Thurgood Marshall was an American lawyer in the Supreme Court of the United States. Other given option are incorrect. Greenberg gave personal knowledge of Thurgood Marshall and about the case but the informational article was only based on research.
Greenberg interview gave important details while article was based only on research.
Answer:
The referring to one self with pronouns such as "I" or saying phrases such as "he told me" along with narration of personal thoughts (but that is contextual)
Explanation:
I say it's D because it is showing everything that you talked about
Hope this help
Answer:
This is expressing the material wealth and excess of the 1920s.
Explanation:
At the time after the war, stock markets were high and people began to experience more national wealth and extravagance, a huge difference when compared to the previous years, which encompassed WWI. This shows how things were so extravagant on the outside, but it almost foreshadows the period of depression and excessively impoverished time to come in the following years.
I hope this helps! Have a nice day :)
