If there is an insufficient contribution margin to cover fixed expenses, there will always be an occurrence of a net loss.
<h3>What is a Contribution Margin?</h3>
The contribution margin can be expressed in gross income terms. After subtracting the variable element of the firm's expenditures, it indicates the extra money gained for each product sold.
The contribution margin is calculated by subtracting the selling price/unit from the variable cost/unit.
This metric displays how much a certain product adds to the company's total earnings. It displays the share of revenue that helps to pay the firm's fixed costs and gives one approach to illustrate the profit potential of a certain product supplied by a company.
Therefore, If there is an insufficient contribution margin to cover fixed expenses, there will always be an occurrence of a net loss.
Learn more about contribution margin here:
brainly.com/question/24881206
An efficiency ratio known as the capital intensity ratio provides valuable insight into a company's financial situation.
Capital Intensity Ratio = Total Assets/Total Revenue
Return on assets = Net income/Total Assets
Total Assets = Net income/Return on Assets= $389,100/0.086
Total Revenue = Net income/Net Profit Margin = $389,100/0.028
Capital intensity ratio = ($389,100 /0.086) / ($389,100 / 0.028) =0.33
This ratio reveals how much capital or other resources a company has to have in order to make single dollar in sales. This ratio is the inverse of the asset turnover ratio, making it simple to calculate the capital intensity ratio if you already know the asset turnover ratio. For all capital-intensive firms, we require a good or higher capital intensity ratio. A company that invests a significant amount of capital in its manufacturing process is said to be capital-intensive. E.g., Power generating facilities. A company that has made significant investments in assets to generate income has a high capital intensity ratio (CIR). A company with a low CIR is able to produce larger revenues while owning fewer assets. As a result, businesses can use this ratio to modify their capital budgeting and planning.
Learn more about Capital Intensity Ratio here
brainly.com/question/14594640
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is option D.
Explanation:
In 2008, as a financial crisis began to unfold in the United States, the FDIC raised the limit on insured losses to bank depositors from $100,000 per account to $250,000 per account.
During the financial crisis, there was a sense of panic. The regulators were concerned that depositors would expect their banks to crash and would fear that they may lose their money. The regulators expect the depositors to pull money back from their banks. The money supply will get reduced further. This will further reduce the money with banks. This could lead to even healthy banks to fail.
Raising the insurance limit would reassure depositors that their money was safe in banks and prevent a bank panic. This will further help to stabilize the financial system.
1. Friedrich von Hayek------------Less government intervention gives people more economic freedom.
To Hayek, less government intervention implied more economic freedom. He trusted that when individuals are allowed to pick, the economy runs all the more proficiently. In the United States, the most grounded supporters of Hayek's thoughts were a gathering of business analysts at the University of Chicago. Known as the "Chicago School of Economics," this inexactly shaped, informal gathering of financial specialists was for the most part connected with free market libertarianism. The name alludes to financial specialists who got their tutoring in the Economics Department at the University of Chicago. To date, almost 50% of all Nobel Prizes in Economics have been won by analysts with connections to Chicago.
2. Milton Friedman---------Government should not control the money supply.
Milton Friedman saw the 1920s as years of indispensable and sustainable growth in the economy. Amid this period the Federal Reserve outstandingly extended the cash supply. This development was not reflected in an expansion in the normal cost level, on the grounds that fiscal powers were killed by simultaneous increments in efficiency.
3. John Maynard Keynes----------Government intervention is necessary for stability.
John Maynard Keynes made the hypothetical contentions for another kind of monetary system: government intervention used to smooth out the business cycle. Keynes died in 1946, yet his thoughts made the Keynesian school of financial aspects and prompted the improvement of macroeconomics. Keynes' belief system overwhelmed the financial worldview from 1945 until the late 1970s. As indicated by Keynes, free markets don't generally contain self-adjusting components; some of the time government intervention is important to limit downturns and advance development. He trusted that without state help, the blasts and busts in the business cycle could winding wild.
4. Adam Smith------------Competition is a regulatory force.
A market economy is a monetary framework in which people claim the greater part of the assets - land, work, and capital - and control their utilization through willful choices made in the commercial center. It is a framework in which the legislature assumes a little role. In this kind of economy, two powers - self-interest and competition - assume a critical job. The role of self interest and competition was depicted by financial specialist Adam Smith more than 200 years prior and still fills in as basic to our comprehension of how showcase economies work.
