The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "all of the above." Non-restrictive clause is always set off by one of more commas. If you take a non-restrictive clause out of a sentence, the basic meaning of the sentence stays the same. <span>A non-restrictive clause is an incidental description thrown into the sentence.</span>
Answer:
In my opinion, machines are a threat to humans even though they make our lives easier and we do not have to work as hard to get a task completed the ways in which humans decide to use machines can be a threat not only to other humans but to the environment.
Yes, I do agree with Dr.Hawking that artificial intelligence may one day equip computers with the technology to outsmart humans. Somehow this is kind of what the world is aiming to do which is shocking as most persons are going to be jobless as machines will do their jobs for them. With less humans having jobs poverty is going to strike our land causing people to die from hunger not to mention healthcare and a stable shelter.
Explanation:
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The rest is learned, not inheritanced.
The sentence which best shows correct comma usage is " What would you like, Ken, for breakfast?" Option B is correct.
When we use vocatives in sentences, that is, names that are being addressed direcly, they must be separated with a comma or commas from the rest of the sentence.
In this particular case, the word Ken is between commas to be separated from the rest of the sentence. However, since vocatives tend to be at the beginning or end of a sentence, it should be semarated only by one comma.
