There are a few errors in this sentence.
Here is what it should look like:<span></span>
<span><span>She enjoys eating at two types of restaurants, Italian and Mexican.</span></span>
<span><span>- the verb enjoy must agree with the subject she</span></span>
<span><span>-type must be plural because you are talking about two restaurants in your sentences</span></span>
<span><span>- I believe a comma should follow restaurants because there needs to be a pause. </span></span>
<span><span>You don't use a semicolon in this case because you are not connecting an independent clause. Independent clauses can stand alone meaning it is a complete thought/complete sentence. In your case Italian and Mexican cannot do cannot stand alone. </span></span>
<span><span>**Not only are semicolons used to connect independent clauses they are also used connect a thought meaning if the first part of the sentence is an independent clause but the second part isn't and it continues on talking about the first part of the sentence then you would put a semicolon between the two. For example: Love isn't something you experience; it's something you chose to do even when it is hard to do. (I made this sentence up).</span></span>
<span><span>Hopefully this helps and good luck.</span></span>
<span><span />
</span>
Answer:
Allusion.
Explanation:
The allusion is exemplified as the literary device through which the author proposes a quick and indirect allusion or reference to a particular personality, place, event, idea, or object that carries its significance historically, literary, politically, and culturally. The chief aim of employing such a device is to uplift the contextual value and relevance of the text.
In the given quote, the author employs literary allusion to enhance the contextual worth of the text (as reflected by the reference to great literary fiction like 'Frankenstein' by Mary Shelley and G.B. Shaw's famous play 'Pygmalion') that requires the readers' to possess prior knowledge to have a comprehensive understanding of the author's intended idea. Therefore, '<u>allusion</u>' is the correct answer.
I found one study online that test FEV 200-1200 in Lybian men. What they found is that FEV 200-1200 is negatively correlated with age and positively correlated with standing height. They indicate that FEV 200-1200 for this age group is 3.88, but the average height of their participants is a bit lower than 6 feet 1 in.
Link to the study (http://thorax.bmj.com/content/thoraxjnl/43/11/923.full.pdf )
I found another study that test FEV in Indian their results are much higher than those in the previous study. Link to the study(https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4675/0b220f0ac39a78bd2aa0851f27496b0e288e.pdf).
I think the answer should be C.
Answer:
The effect is:
B. Readers care more about what happens to the character.
Explanation:
If a character is only superficial, readers will not feel as if they know him. And it is difficult to care about someone we do not know well. However, <u>when an author takes time to properly develop a character, readers get to truly know him. His feelings, emotions, issues, traits, traumas and so on are all built and revealed in a way that makes readers close to this person. We begin to care about him, to worry about what will happen to him, to root for him - or, in some cases, against him. It's as if the character becomes important, now that we know him so well, to the point of engaging us.</u>
C violated the social construction of reality
