1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
muminat
3 years ago
6

In what ways was the golden age of akbar similar to and different from the flowering of the safavid empire under shah abbas and

of the ottoman empire under suleiman i
History
1 answer:
nignag [31]3 years ago
8 0

The three rulers share many aspects in common:

Strong government. Akbar, Shah Abbas, and Suleiman remained in power until their death. The three of them based their power in a strong army, which they used to expand their empires, and in the centralization of public administration. This, jointly with economic prosperity, allowed them to create a time of social and political stability.

Flourishing of art, science, and culture. Under their patronage, the three empires entered in a golden time of development of the arts and culture. In the Ottoman Empire, under Suleiman's rule, hundreds of artist communities were created, which used to combine artistic influences from Turkish, Islamic, and European origins. Suleiman himself was a poet and he created many schools and universities free for Muslim boys. Akbar created a library of over 24,000 books written in different languages, one library exclusive for women and many scholars, translators, and calligraphers from different religions and cultures were welcomed to study. Shah Abbas impulsed the creation of a school of painting, which created the finest Iranian paintings in its History, and also he enhanced the production of ceramic pottery.

Diplomacy. The three rulers were expert diplomats, which allowed them to make strategical alliances and negotiations with neighbor states in order to keep peace and the safety -and also the expansion- of their frontiers.

Reformers. The three rulers were also great reformers of their societies. Under Shah Abbas, the Mughal Empire experienced a syncretization of Persian, Indian, Islamic, Hindu and several other traditions. He created a new religion -or it should be called a political system- called Din-i Illahi, which attempted to bring unity in plurality. Suleiman, on the other hand, was a great legislator, he adapted the traditional laws to the new times, making them more tolerant with non-Muslims. Shah Abbas moved the capital of the Safavid Empire to Isfahan and reformed the army.

The differences can be seen mainly in how their power was limited by religious law.

Akbar was the head of the new state's religious and ethical system Din-i Illahi, even calling himself a prophet, which gave him a big personal power. He shares a similarity with Shah Abbas' absolute power. Since the Safavid emperor was the representative of the Imams he was not limited by the Islamic law, because he had both a temporal and spiritual power. This is very different from Suleiman, who was strictly limited by the Islamic law, as they were interpreted by the religious authorities.

You might be interested in
What effect did the customs duties imposed by the Navigation Acts in the 1600s have on North America? A. England was able to str
Alik [6]

I wanna say the answer is- B.

I might be wrong,so if I am,I'm sorry

3 0
3 years ago
Fraction of states that must agree to change the constitution
abruzzese [7]

Answer:

three-fourths of the states must agree to change the constitution

6 0
3 years ago
The m the most fundamental weakness of the articles of confederation was a lack of
Nadusha1986 [10]
Lack of Power to raise funds for the militia. The significant defeat of the Articles of Confederation was just shortcoming. The government, under the Articles, was excessively feeble, making it impossible to authorize their laws and in this way had no power. The Continental Congress had acquired cash to battle the Revolutionary War and couldn't reimburse their obligations.
3 0
4 years ago
write a three body paragraph explaning how the american and french revolution are different and the same
Citrus2011 [14]
You really think someone wants to waste time writing your essay? Stop being lazy.
5 0
3 years ago
PLZ HURRY
iren2701 [21]

The Answers are.....

1.c

2.C

3.b

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • To speak out against
    9·2 answers
  • At the height of the vietnam war, the united states stationed approximately how many troops in vietnam?
    11·1 answer
  • What are factors of production?
    6·2 answers
  • During the middle ages drama was used by the church as a method of
    5·2 answers
  • N supporting the WWI effort, New Mexicans chose not to _______________
    11·2 answers
  • What effect did Israel’s division have on its survival? Which cultures conquered Israel?
    6·1 answer
  • Describe Congressional Reconstruction
    9·1 answer
  • ?early mycenaean civilization was based on which political rule??
    9·1 answer
  • Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the tract
    9·1 answer
  • The program being promoted by this poster was created to
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!