1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
muminat
3 years ago
6

In what ways was the golden age of akbar similar to and different from the flowering of the safavid empire under shah abbas and

of the ottoman empire under suleiman i
History
1 answer:
nignag [31]3 years ago
8 0

The three rulers share many aspects in common:

Strong government. Akbar, Shah Abbas, and Suleiman remained in power until their death. The three of them based their power in a strong army, which they used to expand their empires, and in the centralization of public administration. This, jointly with economic prosperity, allowed them to create a time of social and political stability.

Flourishing of art, science, and culture. Under their patronage, the three empires entered in a golden time of development of the arts and culture. In the Ottoman Empire, under Suleiman's rule, hundreds of artist communities were created, which used to combine artistic influences from Turkish, Islamic, and European origins. Suleiman himself was a poet and he created many schools and universities free for Muslim boys. Akbar created a library of over 24,000 books written in different languages, one library exclusive for women and many scholars, translators, and calligraphers from different religions and cultures were welcomed to study. Shah Abbas impulsed the creation of a school of painting, which created the finest Iranian paintings in its History, and also he enhanced the production of ceramic pottery.

Diplomacy. The three rulers were expert diplomats, which allowed them to make strategical alliances and negotiations with neighbor states in order to keep peace and the safety -and also the expansion- of their frontiers.

Reformers. The three rulers were also great reformers of their societies. Under Shah Abbas, the Mughal Empire experienced a syncretization of Persian, Indian, Islamic, Hindu and several other traditions. He created a new religion -or it should be called a political system- called Din-i Illahi, which attempted to bring unity in plurality. Suleiman, on the other hand, was a great legislator, he adapted the traditional laws to the new times, making them more tolerant with non-Muslims. Shah Abbas moved the capital of the Safavid Empire to Isfahan and reformed the army.

The differences can be seen mainly in how their power was limited by religious law.

Akbar was the head of the new state's religious and ethical system Din-i Illahi, even calling himself a prophet, which gave him a big personal power. He shares a similarity with Shah Abbas' absolute power. Since the Safavid emperor was the representative of the Imams he was not limited by the Islamic law, because he had both a temporal and spiritual power. This is very different from Suleiman, who was strictly limited by the Islamic law, as they were interpreted by the religious authorities.

You might be interested in
What was one effect of the French and Indian war on Great Britain American colonies<br> 1
Lynna [10]

Answer:

1. The colonists were taxed to help pay back Great Britain's war costs.

Explanation:

The British victory greatly expanded British territory, but also largely expanded Britain's debt.

4 0
2 years ago
In what way might a persons race affect his or her perspective on the war?
jarptica [38.1K]

Answer:

In addition to their different assessments of the current state of race relations and racial inequality in the United States, Americans across racial and ethnic groups also see race and ethnicity playing out differently in their personal lives. 

8 0
2 years ago
my definition of the meaning of life is very different from your definition, because i grew up in a very religious home. this is
Kobotan [32]

Answer:

This is probably an example of forced religinous throughout your home. If you want to believe in the meaning of life being something different, go for it!

5 0
2 years ago
Which two u.s. admirals contributed greatly to the defeat of the german u-boat offensive?
Tresset [83]

<span>The two U.S. admirals whose work contributed greatly to the defeat of the German U-boat offensive are Ernest J. King and David D. Porter. Admiral Ernest J. King served as Chief of Naval Operations and Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet to improve the effectiveness of American naval operations.</span>

8 0
3 years ago
Which party level is responsible for bridging the gap between levels by communicating with state party leaders and watching over
aleksandrvk [35]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In the decades before the civil war, cincinnati workers:
    13·1 answer
  • Which event proved that the U.D. purchase of alaska had been a good investment?
    14·2 answers
  • Which section of this diagram represents the highest court that has the power to rule that a law violates the U.S.
    12·1 answer
  • What correctly completes this sentence?
    13·1 answer
  • why did the invention of new spinning machinery increase the number of workers in the textile/cotton industry in Europe?
    14·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a requirement for becoming a naturalized citizen?
    6·2 answers
  • Which voting qualification was designed to prevent African Americans from voting?
    14·2 answers
  • el efecto inmediato de los resultados de la eleccion fue que carolina del sur se separo de la union y se convirtio en los estado
    13·1 answer
  • What did The Great Compromise have the most to do with?
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!