1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
muminat
3 years ago
6

In what ways was the golden age of akbar similar to and different from the flowering of the safavid empire under shah abbas and

of the ottoman empire under suleiman i
History
1 answer:
nignag [31]3 years ago
8 0

The three rulers share many aspects in common:

Strong government. Akbar, Shah Abbas, and Suleiman remained in power until their death. The three of them based their power in a strong army, which they used to expand their empires, and in the centralization of public administration. This, jointly with economic prosperity, allowed them to create a time of social and political stability.

Flourishing of art, science, and culture. Under their patronage, the three empires entered in a golden time of development of the arts and culture. In the Ottoman Empire, under Suleiman's rule, hundreds of artist communities were created, which used to combine artistic influences from Turkish, Islamic, and European origins. Suleiman himself was a poet and he created many schools and universities free for Muslim boys. Akbar created a library of over 24,000 books written in different languages, one library exclusive for women and many scholars, translators, and calligraphers from different religions and cultures were welcomed to study. Shah Abbas impulsed the creation of a school of painting, which created the finest Iranian paintings in its History, and also he enhanced the production of ceramic pottery.

Diplomacy. The three rulers were expert diplomats, which allowed them to make strategical alliances and negotiations with neighbor states in order to keep peace and the safety -and also the expansion- of their frontiers.

Reformers. The three rulers were also great reformers of their societies. Under Shah Abbas, the Mughal Empire experienced a syncretization of Persian, Indian, Islamic, Hindu and several other traditions. He created a new religion -or it should be called a political system- called Din-i Illahi, which attempted to bring unity in plurality. Suleiman, on the other hand, was a great legislator, he adapted the traditional laws to the new times, making them more tolerant with non-Muslims. Shah Abbas moved the capital of the Safavid Empire to Isfahan and reformed the army.

The differences can be seen mainly in how their power was limited by religious law.

Akbar was the head of the new state's religious and ethical system Din-i Illahi, even calling himself a prophet, which gave him a big personal power. He shares a similarity with Shah Abbas' absolute power. Since the Safavid emperor was the representative of the Imams he was not limited by the Islamic law, because he had both a temporal and spiritual power. This is very different from Suleiman, who was strictly limited by the Islamic law, as they were interpreted by the religious authorities.

You might be interested in
How is the method of prediction similar among<br> volcanoes , earthquakes, flooding, and tsunamis.
OLga [1]

Answer:

Vibrations mostly

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
My heart has been broken
saw5 [17]

Answer:

Are you ok? What happened?

Explanation:

:(

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why were southern states in no hurry to permit a Nebraska territory
Vladimir [108]

Answer: The southern states' representatives in Congress were in no hurry to permit a Nebraska territory because the land lay north of the 36°30' parallel — where slavery had been outlawed by the Missouri Compromise of 1820.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The key difference between the experience of Ghana's independence and that of Kenya and Algeria is that
frutty [35]

Answer:

Ghana gained independence peacefully, while Kenya and Algeria had to fight violently before gaining independence.

Explanation:

While Kenya became independent in 1963, it was through series of violence from the Mau Mau against the British. Similarly, Algeria had to fight violently against French rule before gaining independence in 1962.

The above is in contrast to Ghana who gained independence peacefully from British rule in 1957.

Hence, The key difference between the experience of Ghana's independence and that of Kenya and Algeria is that "Ghana gained independence peacefully, while Kenya and Algeria had to fight violently before gaining independence."

8 0
3 years ago
In the Declaration of Independence, it states: "all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain u
Snezhnost [94]
 Unalienable means that it<span> cannot be taken away or denied.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The Olmec civilization
    14·1 answer
  • Lets talk I'm bored plzzzzzz
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following is the best definition for The Rule of Thirds? The placement of sentences into three parts. The placement
    6·1 answer
  • Why was oglethorpe's prohibition of slavery reversed?
    9·1 answer
  • What year did James Naismith invent basketball?
    10·2 answers
  • Why were early factories located in the north? The workers live in the northern regions. The money for investment was in the nor
    11·1 answer
  • What caused the Soviet Union to get involved in countries as diverse as Egypt, the Congo and Vietnam?
    7·1 answer
  • Diferencias entre policial negro y el de enigma
    9·2 answers
  • What are cryptograms ? Give any three example.​
    12·1 answer
  • 5. What was the rise of labor unions? (1pt)
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!