1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
faust18 [17]
3 years ago
14

What incentive might a national government have for improving education and literacy in their country?

History
1 answer:
Ber [7]3 years ago
8 0

In the present world economy, a population well educated with a college education is necessary to technological growth and economic development of the country. Since we can correlate a higher standard of living, i.e. better wages and living conditions, to a more rich and diverse economy that needs a good education for technological development, the correct answer is B.

The first and third statements are not logical. Education doesn't eliminate the need for trade; peoples need to trade to get what they don't have or don't produce -- education can at most reduce need of trade. As for trusting the government, in reality, more educated people are usually better prepared to criticize the government.

The fourth statement doesn't fit every reality. Most of the time national governments improve education to produce industrialized goods, not agricultural ones.

You might be interested in
Who was the first African-American<br> flying group to serve in World War II?
inysia [295]

Answer:

The Tuskegee Airmen carried an extra burden into battle. They felt that they had to prove that African Americans could fly warplanes successfully against a determined and powerful enemy.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these technological developments did not affect the world economics during world war 1
Studentka2010 [4]
What are the choices?
6 0
3 years ago
In 1992, presidential candidate H. Ross Perot said that signing the NAFTA agreement would produce a "giant sucking sound" in the
Natali [406]

Answer:

In 1992, presidential candidate H. Ross Perot said that signing the NAFTA agreement would produce a "giant sucking sound" in the United States. He meant that NAFTA would make jobs in the United States go to Mexico, where laboral costs were lower, thus producing unemployment and poverty in the United States. In view of the events, 17 years later we can affirm that the fears of H. Ross Perot were never confirmed.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A tariff is a _____ on _____ goods.
svp [43]
A tariff is a tax on goods
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain the rise of the sunbelt​
solmaris [256]
One of the central developments of the second half of the 20th
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why were Loyalists willing to support continued British rule but Patriots were not?
    13·2 answers
  • The recent history of Kurdish nationalism includes all of the following except ____.
    11·1 answer
  • How did thomas jefferson react to shays's rebellion?
    5·1 answer
  • The commonwealth of Puerto Rico is
    9·1 answer
  • Select all of the methods that employers use against workers and unions.
    15·2 answers
  • Britain wanted control over the _____ because it was the shortest naval route between _____ and ______.
    9·2 answers
  • Please help I put a lot of points and please don’t just put whatever for the points. This is important please
    5·2 answers
  • Why was the POW/MIA issue unique during the Vietnam War?
    10·1 answer
  • I'm a 6th grader. I need to make my own Greek myth in my own words. Can someone make me a myth pls?​
    12·1 answer
  • How do these sources help you better understand the quotation from Judge Stewart Daizel in Primary Source A? Cite atleast one re
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!