Answer:
<em>Signs</em>
Answer in sentence:
<u>In order to identify hazards early and avoid last minute moves, you should scan the road signs seconds ahead of your vehicle.</u>
<u><em>Hope this helps :)</em></u>
Answer:
The court should stick to statutory language. These days common law is being turned into statutory law.
Explanation:
The U.S. legal system were set up based on the common law, which adhered to the precedents of earlier cases as sources of law. This principle is known as stare decisis. Under stare decisis, once a court has answered the question, the same question in other cases must draw out from the same court or lower court the same response in that jurisdiction.
Stare decisis is a doctrine which has always been a major part of the common law, court should follow precedents when they established clearly, expected under compelling reasons. The doctrine of stare decisis will remain valid even more common law is being turned into statutory law. After all, statutes have to be interpreted by the courts.
There is certainly less common law governing like environmental law than there was 100 years ago. The federal and state governments are increasingly regulating the aspects of commercial transaction between merchants and consumers, when disputes arise may be the courts should stick to statutory language.
Answer:
The simple answer is yes a female should be paid the same, but often this is not the case.
Explanation:
Morally, yes a female with the same qualifications and experience should be paid the same salary as the counterpart prior to her, though it is not a law that there can't be a wage gap between women and men and this is most commonly not a reality. Women are often paid less than men with the same degree, qualifications, and experience, especially if the woman is part of a racial minority, or in a male dominated industry. Often, employers are able to find loopholes and reasons, "justifying" this unjust wage gap.
