Answer:
negligence per se
Explanation:
Negligence per se -
According to this offense , it is the breaking of the statute , which is applied to save the people from a particular type of danger or harm .
It is based on , the duty of care .
And , the duty of care , is determined by the jury under the normal negligence rules .
Similarly in the question , Ted hit Zoey accidentally and constitutes , negligence per se .
For a person who travels often, the main consideration in purchasing a computer would be portability.
What does portability mean in it?
If a computer program can be used in an operating system other than the one it was designed for without requiring extensive rewriting, it is said to be portable. The process of porting entails carrying out any work required to enable the computer software to function in the new setting.
What are the most important considerations when comparing computer systems?
The speed and storage capacity of the computer are among the more crucial factors. These factors are categorized under the term "computer specifications," which is used to describe how well a computer will function.
Learn more about portable devices: brainly.com/question/28075818
#SPJ4
Answer:
No, she did not
Explanation:
In this question, we are asked to answer if Mae stayed within her budget, given her budget and the total amount she later spent.
To solve this problem, what we need to do is to add up all what she budgeted. Afterwards we add up all she spent. Then , we see the difference between the two to actually know if she stayed within her budget of not.
We proceed as follows:;
Let’s calculate budgeted amount: This is ; 180 + 475 + 15 + 50 + 65 + 25 + 150 + 30 = $990
Now, let’s calculate how much she later spent; That would be; 182 + 475 + 12 + 65 + 68 + 12.5 + 36 + 150 = $1000.5
We can see that she spent more that the amount she had budgeted. This means she didn’t stay within the total amount allocated for her budget
Answer:
The existence and growth of government trade barriers
Explanation:
Theodore Levitt proposed that with the advent of technology and the mass media, people's tastes would eventually converge leading to the globalization of markets around the world. Even though people from different nations tend to have different tastes, they were united by factors like love, peace, joy, etc. Levitt was encouraging companies to leverage on the mass media as well as technology to form a convergence of these uniting factors.
However, government trade barriers, which are restrictions placed by the government on the importation of goods into another country can serve as a hindrance to the globalization of markets. This would be in opposition to Levitt's proposal of a uniting factor in international trade. Government trade barriers tend to encourage the production of local goods against the importation of goods.
I think it’s true
(Not sure)
