The correct answer is C.
In fact the other options provided state the weaknesses that the Europeans encountered in their conflicts against the native Americans. They did not know the land, whose wilderness added extra dificulties for strangers, and in the case they needed reinforcements, the process of bringing them from Europe was long and costly.
But these weaknesses were rapidly outbalanced due to the huge superiority that the Europeans had in terms of weaponry if compared to the natives. They already knew gunpowder, while, natives Americans were still using bows and arrows. Moreover, the Europeans had properly organized armies, with its hierarchies, different units, experienced and skilled commanders, etc.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
They had to bring troops and supplies over long distances across the Pacific Ocean repeatedly to reach Sapian, the Philippines, Iwo Jima, and Okinawa throughout the war.
Ellos tuvieron que adaptarse al cambio climático y tuvieron que desarrollar nuevas formas de crecer y cosechar los alimentos.<span>
</span>
D) American citizens wanted to stay neutral until the innocent were killed.
Answer: Adam Smith described the opposing, but complementary forces of self-interest and competition as the invisible hand. While producers and consumers are not acting with the intent of serving the needs of others or society, they do. Smith argued against mercantilism and was a major proponent of laissez-faire economic policies. In his first book, "The Theory of Moral Sentiments," Smith proposed the idea of an invisible hand—the tendency of free markets to regulate themselves by means of competition, supply and demand, and self-interest. 1
Explanation:
