Answer:
This is a complex question and is making reconsider my life
Explanation:
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the "official records of the MLB", since this would be an unaltered "primary source". </span></span>
By looking a the options I would say that the answer is A.
Answer: True
Explanation: True. Because the practice of neocolonialism is that the more developed economies try to exert influence in developing countries through economic aid indirectly, creating a state of dependence for their economic, social, political and cultural conditions. Circumstance that is taken advantage of by those powers that see in this new system of colonialism the opportunity to achieve more wealth and to subjugate the countries over which they exert such influence to obtain their own benefit.
Answer:
Explanation:
I don't see how this is possible, but the answer seems to be A which is the only answer that makes sense.
Large tax cuts don't have anything to do with supply of goods. It does help consumption but that is not the same thing as supply side economics.
C is much truer for the aftermath of WWI than a general statement about Supply. I don't think it is the right answer.
It didn't call for increased government spending unless the government wanted the goods being produced.
I think I'd go with A. It is the most straight forward.
