I would say alliances and nationalism because nationalism only encouraged countries to go to war and prove that they were the best most powerful country around and in terms of WWI, nationalism led to strong dedication to the army and just keep most countries in the war longer than they should have been in it. Alliances were significant in the exact beginning of the war and the scale to which the war was fought. The many (secret) alliances led to austria-hungary and Serbia to sorta threaten each other, which brought Germany in, then France, etc.
Ramesses II<span> (1279-1213 BCE, alternative spellings: Ramses, Rameses) was known to the Egyptians as </span>Userma’atre’setepenre<span>, which means 'Keeper of Harmony and Balance, Strong in Right, Elect of Ra’. He is also known also as Ozymandias and as </span>Ramesses<span> the Great. He was the third </span>pharaoh<span> of the 19th Dynasty (1292-1186 BCE) who claimed to have won a decisive victory over the </span>Hittites<span> at The </span>Battle<span> of </span>Kadesh<span> and used this event to enhance his reputation as a great warrior.
</span>
The answer is D. Supply-side economics.
Starting a civil war to take power from the senate