1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nina [5.8K]
4 years ago
6

Describe how improved transportation has affected trade for farmers and manufacturers in the Midwest.

History
1 answer:
r-ruslan [8.4K]4 years ago
3 0

Answer:The ways that improved transportation and new inventions affected trade for farmers and manufacturers in the Midwest were that they could move goods faster and more cheaply. Consumers could purchase them at lower prices than in the past. Improvements in transportation provided benefits to both businesses and consumers.

Explanation:hope this was useful

You might be interested in
In what decade did most of the African nations become independent?
zhenek [66]

Answer:

En la década comprendida entre 1950 y 1960

Explanation:

En la década comprendida entre 1950 y 1960 se independizó la gran mayoría de los estados del norte, el centro y el oriente del continente, incluida la isla de Madagascar y la región que hoy día se conoce como el Cuerno de África

5 0
3 years ago
Which sentence best explains why critics argue against social welfare programs?
masya89 [10]

Answer:

All those point's are correct but point C explains it better .May it helps you

6 0
2 years ago
Which is a true statement about the federalists?
Wewaii [24]

The correct answer is 4

Explanation:  Federalists headed the government throughout the 1790s, and in 1798 prepared the country for the potential battle with France. There was a naval war called near war without ground combat. The Republican Democrats vigorously opposed the warfare projects of the federalists and succeeded in winning Congress and the presidency in the 1800 election.

3 0
3 years ago
In the lessons in this unit, you have seen how political leaders introduced a variety of plans to bring about Reconstruction in
Sholpan [36]

Answer:

As a country, America has gone though many political changes throughout her lifetime. Leaders have come and gone, all of them having different objectives and plans for the future. As history takes its course, though, most all of these “revolutionary movements” come to an end. One such movement was Reconstruction. Reconstruction was a time period in America consisting of many leaders, goals and accomplishments. Though, like all things in life, it did come to an end, the resulting outcome has been labeled both a success and a failure.

When Reconstruction began in 1865, a broken America had just finished fighting the Civil War. In all respects, Reconstruction was mainly just that. It was a time period of “putting back the pieces”, as people say. It was the point where America attempted to become a full running country once more. This, though, was not an easy task. The memory of massive death was still in the front of everyone’s mind, hardening into resentment and sometimes even hatred. The south was virtually non-existent politically or economically, and searching desperately for a way back in. Along with these things, now living amongst the population were almost four million former slaves, who had no idea how to make a living on their own. They had been freed by the 13th amendment in 1865, and in the future became a great concern to many political leaders. Still, it was no secret that something had to be done. So, as usually happens, political leaders appeared on the stage, each holding their own plan of Reconstruction, each certain their ideas were the correct ones. One of the first people who came up with a blueprint for Reconstruction was the president at the time, Abraham Lincoln. The “Lincoln Plan” was a very open one, stating that after certain criteria were met a confederate state could return to the union. To rejoin, a state had to have ten percent of voters both accept the emancipation of slaves and swear loyalty to the union. Also, those high ranking officers of the state could not hold office or carry out voting rights unless the president said so.

Many of the Radicals did not approve of Johnson’s plan, though. They felt he went over the limit with 13,000 pardons, and that he wasn’t paying enough attention to the major issue, the rights of slaves. In 1868 Andrew Johnson was impeached. All though he was not removed from office at this time, he was basically without authority.

It was at this point that Congress really stepped in with their own plan of Reconstruction. The Reconstruction Act finally passed by congress had two main points to it. First, troops were required to move in and take up residence in the confederate states of the south. Secondly, any state that wanted back into the union was only allowed to do so when and if they changed their 14th amendment. They had to agree that all men born in the U.S. were citizens, and that because of that they were guaranteed equal treatment by the law. Later, in 1870, black men were also granted the vote…but this would come later.

Now, the Reconstruction Act looked really good on paper, but as usually happens in politics somebody rocked the boat. The shake up took place in the 1876 presidential election. The two men running were Democrat Samuel Tilden, and Republican Rutherford B. Hayes. Due to the closeness of the race, a group of men called a “commission” was set up in order to figure out an outcome. In the end, the result was the Compromise of 1877. In this compromise, Hayes was declared the winner, and this was agreed on by both parties. The real kicker was the other stipulation, though. The military occupation of the southern states was put to an end. No big deal, right? WRONG! Without military force to back them up, the freed slaves living down there were without safety. It’s hard to say for sure whether or not Reconstruction was a success or a failure. Since the time it began people have been debating that question.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Which responsibility does Judaism emphasize under the rule of law?
svlad2 [7]
The correct answer of the given question above would be option A. The responsibility that the Judaism emphasizes under the rule of law is that, People have worth because of their ability to reason. Because of the central ideas of the rule of law is to emphasize the dignity and worth of each individual. Hope this answer helps.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What biases in this document would a historian need to consider when
    8·1 answer
  • What is a U.S. nickname ? of the world
    9·2 answers
  • Except on rare occasions, boundaries for congressional and state legislative districts in the united states are redrawn by the s
    6·1 answer
  • Why did performing arts become popular in us cities in the late 18009s?
    14·1 answer
  • In the speech excerpt that you heard in the introduction, French prime minister Jules Ferry made some specific arguments. His go
    8·2 answers
  • Elections during the Gilded Age: - suffered from low voter turnout. - brought an end to Democratic control of the South. - were
    11·1 answer
  • Other than sickness and death, what impacts do pandemics & epidemics have on populations?
    15·1 answer
  • How federalism reflects the distribution of power between national state governments been interpreted over time?
    5·2 answers
  • Can someone help me with this two questions please.
    5·1 answer
  • According to the surviving evidence, the first person to write the word geography was.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!