Answer:
What? Be more specific plz
Explanation:
Answer:
The language in the carbon dioxide article makes the authors sound biased. The article uses negative language to dismiss the opposing point of view. This language includes words such as illogical and misperceptions and phrases such as "prophecies of doom" and "retrogressive policy." The authors also use excessively forceful language to support their conclusion. Some examples include "proven, beyond any doubt," "CO2 is the elixir of life," and "Don't mess with success!".
Explanation:
Answer:
Guppies can live with other peaceful fish in aquariums but piranhas should only be kept in tanks with other piranhas because piranhas typically eat other fishes.
❤
It is a word and sometimes a phrase which explains or modify or clarifies a word not clearly mentioned in a sentence... like after doing the homework,match was resumed... doing is action and there is no subject of main clause,,here doer is not clearly stated ..so the phrase is dangling modifier..