All categories

3 years ago

Please help i will give brainliest!!

Mathematics

2 answers:

Phantasy [73]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

24 zeroes love yalll pls give brainliest

Step-by-step explanation:

Ksenya-84 [330]3 years ago

3 0

22 zeros

Explanation:
5980000000000000000000000
Has 22 zeros

You might be interested in

Please help me. Will give Brain

leonid [27]

Answer:

TY SIR PLS DONATE UR BRAIN AS SAID IN THE QUESTION

8 0

3 years ago

Please answer this asap for 15 pt

crimeas [40]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

what is question that you whant my to answer

6 0

3 years ago

Two triangles can be formed with the given information. Use the Law of Sines to solve the triangles.

EastWind [94]

Answer:

The Law of Sines applies to any triangle and works as follows:

a/sinA = b/sinB = c/sinC

We are attempting to solve for every angle and every side of the triangle. With the given information, A = 61°, a = 17, b = 19, we can solve for the unknown angle that is B.

a/sinA = b/sinB

17/sin61 = 19/sinB

sinB = (19/17)(sin61)

sinB = 0.9774

sin-1(sinB) = sin-1(0.9774)

B = 77.8°

With angle B we can solve for angle C and then side c.

A + B + C = 180°

C = 180° - A - B

C = 180° - 61° - 77.8°

C = 41.2°

a/sinA = c/sinC

17/sin61 = c/sin41.2

c = 17(sin41.2/sin61)

c = 12.8

The first solved triangle is:

A = 61°, a = 17, B = 77.8°, b = 19, C = 41.2°, c = 12.8

However, when we solved for angle B initially, that was not the only possible answer because of the fact that sinB = sin(180-B).

The other angle is simply 180°-77.8° = 102.2°. Therefore, angle B can also be 102.2° which will give us different values for c and C.

C = 180° - A - B

C = 180° - 61° - 102.2°

C = 16.8°

a/sinA = c/sinC

17/sin61 = c/sin16.8

c = 17(sin16.8/sin61)

c = 5.6

The complete second triangle has the following dimensions:

A = 61°, a = 17, B = 102.2°, b = 19, C = 16.8°, c = 5.6

The answer you are looking for is the first option given in the question:

B = 77.8°, C = 41.2°, c = 12.8; B = 102.2°, C = 16.8°, c = 5.6

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

The motion of an object was recorded by measuring the velocity of the object in meters per second at various times, as shown in

LekaFEV [45]

The regression equation that represents the relationship between velocity and time is:

<h3>How to find the equation of linear regression using a calculator?</h3>

To find the equation, we need to insert the points (x,y) in the calculator.

For this problem, the points (t,v), that is, time and velocity, are given as follows:

(0, 6.1), (2.1, 12.2), (5.3, 17.4), (8.2, 26.4), (10, 28.1), (12.1, 32.8).

Hence, inserting these points into a calculator, the equation is given by:

v = 2.19t + 6.7.

More can be learned about a regression equation at brainly.com/question/22992800

#SPJ1

7 0

1 year ago

According to the Vivino website, suppose the mean price for a bottle of red wine that scores 4.0 or higher on the Vivino Rating

Natali [406]

Answer:

a) Null and alternative hypothesis

$H_0: \mu=32.48\\\\H_a:\mu< 32.48$

b) Test statistic t=-1.565

P-value = 0.0612

NOTE: the sample size is n=65.

c) Do not reject H0. We cannot conclude that the price in Providence for a bottle of red wine that scores 4.0 or higher on the Vivino Rating System is less than the population mean of $32.48.

d) Null and alternative hypothesis

$H_0: \mu=32.48\\\\H_a:\mu< 32.48$

Test statistic t=-1.565

Critical value tc=-1.669

t>tc --> Do not reject H0

Do not reject H0. We cannot conclude that the price in Providence for a bottle of red wine that scores 4.0 or higher on the Vivino Rating System is less than the population mean of $32.48.

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a hypothesis test for the population mean.

The claim is that the mean price in Providence for a bottle of red wine that scores 4.0 or higher on the Vivino Rating System is less than the population mean of $32.48.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

$H_0: \mu=32.48\\\\H_a:\mu< 32.48$

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample has a size n=65.

The sample mean is M=30.15.

As the standard deviation of the population is not known, we estimate it with the sample standard deviation, that has a value of s=12.

The estimated standard error of the mean is computed using the formula:

$s_M=\dfrac{s}{\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{12}{\sqrt{65}}=1.4884$

Then, we can calculate the t-statistic as:

$t=\dfrac{M-\mu}{s/\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{30.15-32.48}{1.4884}=\dfrac{-2.33}{1.4884}=-1.565$

The degrees of freedom for this sample size are:

$df=n-1=65-1=64$

This test is a left-tailed test, with 64 degrees of freedom and t=-1.565, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a t-table):

$\text{P-value}=P(t$

As the P-value (0.0612) is bigger than the significance level (0.05), the effect is not significant.

The null hypothesis failed to be rejected.

At a significance level of 0.05, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that the mean price in Providence for a bottle of red wine that scores 4.0 or higher on the Vivino Rating System is less than the population mean of $32.48.

<u>Critical value approach</u>

<u></u>

At a significance level of 0.05, for a left-tailed test, with 64 degrees of freedom, the critical value is t=-1.669.

As the test statistic is greater than the critical value, it falls in the acceptance region.

The null hypothesis failed to be rejected.

6 0

2 years ago