1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lapo4ka [179]
3 years ago
10

Roosevelt helped explain and gain support for his new policies by the use of:

History
1 answer:
Gnesinka [82]3 years ago
3 0
A. Roosevelt used Fireside Chats to help explain and gain support for his new policies. 
You might be interested in
How did JFK change America culturally?
kiruha [24]

he influenced the character on mtv's Clone High, JFK, of whom became a pop culture thing in the line "nothing bad ever happens to the kennedys!"

3 0
3 years ago
How does the rule of law remain constant through changes and growth in society?
hodyreva [135]

Answer:Other important determinants of well-being, such as the proportion of a country that is tropical and the proportion that is urban, as well as economic freedom and the rule of law, are included in the multiple regression estimates. Thus, the sensitivity of poverty and environmental factors to population growth is examined with other factors held constant. Measures of the sensitivity of human well-being–the elasticities of these measures–in response to population growth can be calculated. Norton shows that characteristics such as a nation’s economic freedom and its legal framework are more important in determining the quality of human life and the environment than is population growth

The rule of law is defined in the Oxford English Dictionary as: "The authority and influence of law in society, especially when viewed as a constraint on individual and institutional behavior; (hence) the principle whereby all members of a society (including those in government) are considered equally subject to publicly disclosed legal codes and processes."[2] The term "rule of law" is closely related to "constitutionalism" as well as "Rechtsstaat", and refers to a political situation, not to any specific legal rule

The rule of law implies that every person is subject to the law, including people who are lawmakers, law enforcement officials, and judges.[8] In this sense, it stands in contrast to tyranny or oligarchy where the rulers are held above the law.[citation needed] Lack of the rule of law can be found in both democracies and monarchies, for example when there is neglect or ignorance of the law. The rule of law is more apt to decay if a government has insufficient corrective mechanisms for restoring it.

Explanation:

Most legal theorists believe that the rule of law has purely formal characteristics. For instance, such theorists claim that law requires generality (general rules that apply to classes of persons and behaviors as opposed to individuals), publicity (no secret laws), prospective application (little or no retroactive laws), consistency (no contradictory laws)[38], equality (applied equally throughout all society), and certainty (certainty of application for a given situation), but formalists contend that there are no requirements with regard to the content of the law. Others, including a few legal theorists, believe that the rule of law necessarily entails protection of individual rights. Within legal theory, these two approaches to the rule of law are seen as the two basic alternatives, respectively labelled the formal and substantive approaches. Still, there are other views as well. Some believe that democracy is part of the rule of law.

Fundamentally it means that there is an appropriate system through which things must be done, and all, including those who lead, must follow it. It is important, because if we do not follow the rule of law, we have chaos. Here in the US, it is the rule of law which allows us to have our Republic.

6 0
3 years ago
We’re the founders wrong to want to keep the presidency free of partisan differences?
vodomira [7]

Answer:

No, they weren't

Explanation:

The decisions made by the president will affect all Citizens, regardless of their political affiliation.  By keeping the presidency free of partisan differences, the founding fathers hoped that the president could create policies that are suitable for the Country's needs and  benefited the majority of the people. O

The founding fathers  believe that It is impossible for the president to satisfy all citizens. Each citizens have their own interest which might oppose the interest of other citizens.

4 0
3 years ago
Who was the 5th president?
Rus_ich [418]

Answer:

James Monroe

Explanation:

i need three more brainliest plz help

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When did the braves win the world series?
Art [367]
Atlanta Braves/World Series championships
1 of 1
1995
1957
1914
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement is false? A monopoly sells lower-quality products at higher prices than in a perfect competition. Natural monopo
    14·2 answers
  • In order to provide supplies for war, consumer goods were _______.
    7·1 answer
  • The expression 100+5n can be used to find the total price for n students to take a field trip to the science museum. Determine t
    15·1 answer
  • What were the financial benefits of the encomienda for the Spanish.?
    13·1 answer
  • Which sentence best relates an example in an objective manner?
    9·2 answers
  • What are two areas of the American colonial economy that African slaves directly contributed to?
    6·1 answer
  • Why did muhammad leave mecca for medina?
    13·2 answers
  • How did indigenous people in southwest Asia respond to colonial rule
    14·1 answer
  • It's okay were hunting Communist
    7·1 answer
  • Explain the equality?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!