Answer:
The British government's position was that Parliament's authority was unlimited, while the American position was that colonial legislatures were coequal with Parliament and outside of its jurisdiction.
Answer:
Sociology, Anthropology, Philosophy and English/Literature
Explanation: Searched it up
Answer:
Because of the Alliance with Serbia, France and Britain, and fear of German expected demands
Explanation:
The reason the Russian provisional government keeps Russian troops involved in World War I after the Russian revolution of 1917 is because of the "of the Alliance with Serbia, France, and Britain."
During this period, Russia still relies heavily on the loans they are getting from Britain and France, and at the same time, they also want to maintain the alliance with Serbia.
The Russian government also feared the kind of demands the German will ask of them if the Germans win the war.
Both presidentialism and parliamentarism are unequivocally democratic, but each of these regimes leads to different political consequences.
The great difference is that in parliamentarism the executive branch is composed of a president or a monarch, head of state, with limited powers, and a government appointed by Parliament, which at any time can censor. In presidentialism, however, the head of state and government coincide in the same person, are not subject to parliamentary censure and the Legislative Branch is limited to the area of law making.
Therefore, in presidentialism, voters elect the head of government (who in turn is head of state); instead, in parliamentarism, the head of government is appointed by the head of state, who is voted by the people.
Answer:
Yes it's true the Erie canal was an important part of the market revolution
