Answer:
Usually it's either a convent or monastery!
Explanation:
I remember doing this I just look back at my notes!
The difference between the Social contract theories of both was that Hobbs believed<u> c) that the </u><u>people </u><u>could </u><u>overthrow </u><u>their</u><u> ruler </u><u>if that ruler was </u><u>abusing </u><u>their </u><u>power</u><u>. </u>
<h3>Social Contract according to Locke</h3>
- Government owes citizens the right to protect their property.
- If a government was not performing, they could be removed from power.
Hobbes on the other hand, believed that the government owed nothing to the citizens and so the people could not remove it even if it wasn't performing.
In conclusion, option c is correct.
Find out more on Locke's theory at brainly.com/question/14308888.
Answer:
The correct answer is D. The French did not push them off their land or try to change their customs.
Explanation:
The relationship between the French and the Native Americans was way more cordial than the relationship between the British and the Native Americans. The French were interested in establishing trade posts instead of permanent settlements like the British did, so they did not displaced the Native people. The French respected their ways, made a point to learn their languages, and worked closely with them in the fur trade, becoming trusted friends.
That is why the Native Americans sided with the French against the British in the Seven Years War.
He brought them a treaty, The Meiji restoration happened and because of that the Tokugawa Shogunate ended. And modernization of japan started to begin.
What are the answer options?
