1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Hoochie [10]
3 years ago
10

Which of the following is a negation of the statement below?

English
2 answers:
Ira Lisetskai [31]3 years ago
7 0

The statement that is a negation of the statement "all students like math" is " All students do not like math." Option A is correct.

The second sentence is wrong because there are two negations in the sentence which is not grammatically correct in English. The third and four sentences are not negations, on the contrary, they are sentences written in the affirmative form.

Negation is the process that turns an affirmative statement into its opposite denial.

Pie3 years ago
5 0
The answer would be A. All students do not like math
You might be interested in
Why might a poet use inverted syntax in a poem? (Choose all correct answers.)
jolli1 [7]

Answer:

I believe the answer is "to emphasize a word or idea"

Explanation:

When an inverted syntax is used in any writing, especially poems, it is likely there to try and bring the readers attention to a specific part of the poem which may also symbolize something different.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read about Maya and answer the question.
qaws [65]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are Logical Fallacies<br><br><br> in your own words. don't lookup google definition
quester [9]

Answer:

A logical fallacy is a mistaken belief to the effect that inferences having a certain structure are valid. Put another way,  a logical fallacy is a belief in the legitimacy of what is in fact an illegitimate rule of inference.  As the examples below indicate, logical fallacies are sometimes a reflection of mere prejudice and in other cases they embody actual ratiocinative  shortcomings.

Explanation:

Here are some examples:

(1) People will often accept what people in authority, even if the data clearly indicates that they're wrong. If an economist from Harvard weighs in on an issue and homeless person weighs in on that same issue, the economist will be believed and the homeless person will be ridiculed, even if the data makes it very clear that the homeless person is right. (This is known as the 'fallacy of authority.' )

(2) People tend judge others by their words, not their deeds, with the result that a grouchy person who does good is seen as evil, whereas an evil person who pays lip-service to virtue is seen as good.

(3) People assume that what they are not familiar with is impossible. Smith says that his girlfriend has symptoms XYZ and Jones, not having ever personally seen anybody exhibiting those symptoms, refuses on that basis alone to believe Jones.

(4) People have some tendency to assume that entailments are 'convertible', i.e. that if q follows from p, then p also follows from q ('if Smith was decapitated, then he died; so given that he died, he must have been decapitated'). This known as 'affirming the consequent.'        

(5) It is assumed that confirmation is transitive, i.e. that if p confirms q and q confirms r, then p confirms. But this is not so. Smith's being a crime boss is evidence of his having considerable, and Smith's having considerable wealth is evidence of his having some kind of legitimate employment; but Smith's being a crime boss is not evidence of his having legitimate employment.

When people commit fallacies 1-3, their doing so tends to have an emotional basis; they want to believe that authority-figures are good people, that people are honest, and that what is strange is impossible. When people commit fallacies 4 and 5, their doing is less a reflection of emotionally rooted prejudices than of sheer lack of acumen. In any case, all of these fallacies are routinely committed.

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The first person in the door was she.
True [87]
<span>Since the pronoun comes after the predicate, I think "she" being used as a predicate nominative. So the answer is A:)</span>
3 0
3 years ago
A___________will help you to understand how a President gets elected through the general election process
mart [117]
A method that would help <span>you to understand how a President gets elected through the general election process is named as the electoral system. Furthermore, this procedure is used to show the outline of the election process in which it would be followed by methods of electing the president.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is not a key consideration when developing a piece of writing?
    8·1 answer
  • What does he feel the curious case of Benjamin button
    8·1 answer
  • LOOK AT THE IMAGE TO BETTER UNDERSTAND
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes gothic literature?
    5·1 answer
  • Which said since contains a prepositional phrase
    13·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP !!!!!
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following is an example of a denotative meaning? a. “Tree; a large woody plant that survives and continues to grow
    13·2 answers
  • ....sun is shining.<br>​
    14·2 answers
  • When writing the beginning of a personal narrative, it is important to
    13·1 answer
  • Of envy.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!