The revision that will make the sentence more precise is this: I HAVE SOME CHANGES THAT I BELIEVE WOULD MAKE THE TRAFFIC LIGHT SYSTEM WORK BETTER.
This sentence is more precise, because it gives accurate information about the intention of the speaker. The original sentence was a little bit confusing because of the word choice of the speaker but the revised version chose the right words to express the speaker's intention.
I think the sentences that contain a restrictive clause is the 2nd and 4th one.
The main reason why Odysseus orders music and dancing is make it seem like a wedding celebration is happening, but he also wants to reward his men.
Answer:
Some actors work as a waiter until their big break.
Explanation:
The sentence that contains an inappropriate shift in person is the last one. Instead of <em>a waiter,</em> we should say <em>waiters </em>(<em>Some actors work as waiters</em>...). <em>Actors </em>is a plural noun and it should be followed by a plural noun. Another thing that confirms this is the use of the plural possessive pronoun <em>their</em>.
The rest of the sentences are correct. In the first sentence, there is no dilemma. In the second sentence, we have the phrase <em>many people</em>, which requires a plural verb and plural possessive pronoun. These conditions are fulfilled. The third sentence is a bit tricky because of the correlative conjunction <em>neither... nor.</em> The verb and possessive pronoun should be in the singular form in this case (as <em>Dave</em> is a singular noun), and they are, which makes this sentence correct.
This is why the fourth option is the correct answer.
Yes, this is my example.
You better not be drinking, unless you want consequences.
