The result when Mark Twain attempts to convince different wild and agreeable creatures to collect immense stores of food was that they didn't make it happen.
<h3>What was thought of Mark Twain on different aspects?</h3>
1.This model shows us of ceaseless yearning of people to store more than needed.
2. The Lowest Animal is a paper composed by Mark Twain of his made up explore finished with creatures.
3. In lines 52-64, Twain attests that he attempted to convince creatures, both wild and agreeable, to collect huge stores of food line. In any case, he comments that nobody put away food more than they required. Indeed, the honey bees gathered just what was expected for them for winters.
4.This examination is reminiscent of human instinct's of ravenousness and yearn for more. Through this examination.
5. Twain is passing on the message that people are the creatures that comes at the most reduced creatures and not the opposite way around.
For more information about Twain, refer the following link:
brainly.com/question/8812950
#SPJ1
Cyclops are scary , big , quiet creatures
The answers here are The authors point of view and description if you have to only pick one pick one of those two.
Answer:
The best answer to the question: Which is the best critique explaining why Henrique should revise the summary? would be: He needs to revise the summary and add a little more descriptive language to give it a bit more life.
Explanation:
When you read this particulat summary, you do not get much more from it than a bit of general information on how the events of the story developed and followed. However, it is merely flat, completely emotionless and does not stir a reader to want to know, or read, any further. Literally, Henrique hands over the facts of the story without adding a bit of language, known as figurative language, to leave the reader with the desire to learn more and read more. That is why the critique would be that he needs to add more figurative language to increase the interest of the reader in the story.
