Answer:
- Compare sources to analyze their content for historical bias.
- Approach current interpretations of past events as historical fiction.
Explanation:
Though you can distinguished hindsight bias everywhere in human history, the event was first defined and analyzed as such. We might further look at all the positions and secondary aspects and understand that given these variables, it was apparent what was going to follow. Early studies asked individuals annual-classification trivia puzzles or required them to anticipate federal elections; they asked members to evoke their foresight. You might step away from the movie believing that you knew it all along, but the truth is that you plausibly didn't. When a drama approaches its end, and we learn who the killer was, we may look behind on our concept of the movie and misremember our primary impressions of the guilty character.
Yea I’m pretty sure your answer is A
Answer:
In the ninteenth century there were many signs that political democracy was expanding in Western Europe. First, universal male suffrage laws were passed. Second, the prime minister was responsible to the popularly elected legislative body, not to a king or president. This principle is called ministerial responsibility and is crucial for democracy. Third, mass political parties were formed.
The main difference between both nations was their political views. America was and is a capitalist country and as we know has many freedoms. The Soviet Union on the other hand was a Communist country that gave no rights to its citizens. The United States wasn't happy with that. Also, after WWll, the U.S. provided aid to war torn European countries with the Marshall Plan but the Soviet Union hated this because they wanted to take over those countries.
