Answer:
The possible answers for this question are:
A. a glutamate antagonist
B. an acetylcholine antagonist
C. a serotonin antagonist
D. an epinephrine agonist
The correct answers are:
A. a glutamate antagonist
B. an acetylcholine antagonist
Explanation:
A glutamate antagonist is a substance that is commonly used in clinical medicine as an anesthetic, another common used of this substance could be to treat the neurodegeneration caused by stroke, parkinson, epilepsia and some other neural problems, as it inhibits the glutamate receptors.
On the other side the acetylcholine antagonist works as an inhibitor of the muscarinic receptor, avoiding with this process synapses of the cells.
Answer:
- Support and defend the Constitution.
- <u>Stay informed of the issues affecting your community.
</u>
- Participate in the democratic process.
- <u>Respect and obey federal, state, and local laws.
</u>
- <u>Respect the rights, beliefs, and opinions of others.
</u>
- <u>Participate in your local community.</u>
Explanation:
i chose these four as they are the easiest because 1 being informed about the issues you can change the issue or fix it. 2 respecting the law will put the crime rate down which will make the country safer. 3 respecting other will stop fight that can happen, and will make people more open to there beliefs. 4 helping in your local community will help it grow and develop faster.
<h2><em><u>
im not a 100% but hope this helps </u></em></h2>
Answer:
After his demise, she wedded his child, Gaozong (r. 649-683 CE) and became ruler associate however really was the force behind the sovereign. At the point when Gaozong passed on in 683 CE, Wu assumed responsibility for the public authority as sovereign matron, setting two of her children on the seat and eliminating them nearly as fast.
Explanation:
U decide!
<span>ART BY THOMAS POROSTOCKY</span>PRO: RESEARCH ON GENE EDITING IN HUMANS MUST CONTINUE
By John Harris
<span>John Harris is professor emeritus in science ethics at University of Manchester, U.K., and the author of How to be Good, Oxford University Press 2016.</span>
In February of this year, the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority in the United Kingdom approved a request by the Francis Crick Institute in London to modify human embryos using the new gene editing technique CRISPR-Cas9. This is the second time human embryos have been employed in such research, and the first time their use has been sanctioned by a national regulatory authority. The scientists at the Institute hope to cast light on early embryo development—work which may eventually lead to safer and more successful fertility treatments.
The embryos, provided by patients undergoing in vitro fertilization, will not be allowed to develop beyond seven days. But in theory—and eventually in practice—CRISPR could be used to modify disease-causing genes in embryos brought to term, removing the faulty script from the genetic code of that person’s future descendants as well. Proponents of such “human germline editing” argue that it could potentially decrease, or even eliminate, the incidence of many serious genetic diseases, reducing human suffering worldwide. Opponents say that modifying human embryos is dangerous and unnatural, and does not take into account the consent of future generations.
