Answer:
I do not agree.
Explanation:
The arrival of the British in sub-Saharan Africa is part of European Colonialism, widespread in various parts of the world, with the aim of exploring and dominating a region and all the resources available in it.
It is common to hear that colonization was a blessing for the life of the colonies because it took culture, religion and modenity to a region considered "wild" and "inadequate". However, we can say that colonization was not a blessing anywhere, since in these regions the adoption of European culture and religion was imposed in very violent and authoritarian ways.
All colonies, including sub-Saharan Africa, already had a population established and organized according to their customs and religion. This population was different from what Europeans considered "civilized", but we cannot deny, that the natives had their own type of civilization that functioned efficiently between their citizens and their territory.
However, Europeans considered themselves the owners of the truth, and the only ones endowed with knowledge and education. They totally ignored native civilizations and their cultures, considering them wild and impure, which needed European society to put them in what was right. They used this concept to justify all the violent exploitation and acculturation that the natives went through, because they believed that God had given them the mission to "fix" the peoples and end the civilization that was established in the place, without any consideration.
Answer:
a government that has an influence on states/provinces, but the states/provinces still work on their own.
Explanation:
It was for women to have the right to vote
Ok, so what this is is
mixed number is a+b where a is the whole number and b is the fraction
so
whole number times mixed number is
a(a+b)=aa+ab
that is what they measn with distribute
so if you did the top right one
2 and 1/3 imes 3=(2+1/3)(3)=(2)(3)+(1/3)(3)=6+1=7
if you did bottom middle
5 times 3 and 2/5=5(3+2/5)=(5)(3)+(5)(2/5)=15+10=25
Answer:
Explanation
When the new Constitution was developing in the late 1700s, there were 2 groups: the Federalists and Anti-Federalists.
Both groups knew the current form of government, the Articles of Confederation, was failing. However, the Federalists crafted an entirely new Constitution, but the Anti-Federalists just wanted amendments and revisions to the Articles.
The Articles resulted in a weak and decentralized government. The Anti-Federalists wanted this and stronger state governments. The representatives from these states refused to ratify unless a <u>Bill of Rights </u>was added. This would protect the people's rights in case a leader became too powerful.
