1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sveta [45]
3 years ago
6

How did Hitler’s breaking of the Hitler Stalin pact of 1939 change the war in Europe

History
1 answer:
Digiron [165]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Russia switched to the allies and it made the allies stronger

You might be interested in
Please help if u put a link i stg
Kobotan [32]

Answer:

the answer to your question is b.

8 0
3 years ago
The Nuremberg trials after World War II were largely a symbolic exercise because a small number of Nazis were charged. a small n
Nadya [2.5K]

Answer:

where the f is the answer

Explanation:

im going insane

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these is linked to the Chinese idea of the Mandate of Heaven? (4 points) Group of answer choices Dynastic cycles Popula
butalik [34]

Answer:

A dynastic cycles

Explanation:

It’s the only one that it included or linked to it so I’m correct

6 0
3 years ago
Brazil's government has which of the following?
GalinKa [24]

Answer:

D.  a president who is elected to office

Explanation:

A. is not correct as Brazil is not a monarchy.

B. is incorrect, Brazil is a democracy.

C. is not correct, as Brazil’s legislature has executive headed by the president.

<u>D. is the correct answer. </u>Brazil is a democratic federative republic. <u>President and the cabinet are the executives. President is chosen by the method of election every four years. </u>Voting is compulsory for all citizens between the ages of sixteen to seventy.

4 0
3 years ago
Describe two benefits and two challenges of transitioning to a democratic form of government.
sammy [17]

Answer:

In modern political thought, there are two approaches to the justification of democracy as the best system of government: value-based and rationally utilitarian. Value justifications regard democracy as a value in itself, as a political system that most fully embodies the most important humanistic values: freedom, equality, justice, etc.

The value approach is criticized primarily for its appeal to a democratically minded person who is truly striving for freedom and political equality. However, in the modern world, very many people, if not most, prefer not freedom (which they often perceive even as anti-value), but material well-being, security, and order. Therefore, they put a non-political, social meaning in the most respected values ​​of equality and justice, linking them to ensuring equal opportunities in life or rewarding merit, to which real democracy has a very weak relationship. All this casts doubt on the value group of arguments in favor of democracy.

A rational-utilitarian approach does not deny the certain significance of the value justifications of democracy, but at the same time pushes them to the background. This approach interprets democracy primarily as the most rational, useful way for citizens to organize a political system, allowing them to articulate and harmoniously combine their interests. The most consistently rational-utilitarian group of arguments is expressed in the systemic justifications of democracy: Democracy helps to prevent the rule of dictators, curb power, guarantee the protection of citizens from state arbitrariness; Democracy provides a higher level of economic development and higher rates of economic growth.

Of course, democracy, like any other political system, is not free from serious shortcomings, which, in fact, represent a continuation of its merits. Usually attention is paid to the following weaknesses of democracy:

1. The threat of destabilization of the political system arising from the very principle of election.

2. Political competition can result in conflictogenicity, confrontation, open clashes and, therefore, destabilization of the situation in society.

3. The danger of the tyranny of the majority, confident in its "rightness" and suppressing the will of those who remain in the minority.

4. Possible unprofessionalism of officials elected by an incompetent majority.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The articles of confederation represented the Americans distrust of
    13·2 answers
  • What most fundamentally aided the spread of enlightenment from Europe to America?
    11·1 answer
  • How did the religious events in england affect the colonization efforts in the new world?
    15·1 answer
  • What were mikhail gorbabachevs main reforms
    6·1 answer
  • What are 3 reasons South Carolina seceded?
    11·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP ASL EXAM!!! WILL GIVE BRAIN! Ever since the 1988 protest at Gallaudet University
    5·2 answers
  • __ the act of one nation imposing its will on a weaker country using economic or military pressure to get its way.
    13·2 answers
  • What was the Middle Passage?
    6·2 answers
  • The Paris peace conference ended with the signing of the Treaty of​
    10·1 answer
  • Enhanced communication has allowed for the growth of "networks" of organizations. What are the pros and cons of these new actors
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!