Jamestown island
The English travelers arrived on April 1607 to Jamestown Island, they thought they had arrived to a paradise land after spending four and half months at the sea. They settle in and were eager to extract gold and other treasures to ship back to England, but in their first summer 46 colonists died of mosquito-infestation, hunger and Indian arrows. They are recognized as the first English settlement in North America, but they have been roughly criticized as a group of English men who were looking for money and treasures and found catastrophe. Since Archaeologists found new evidence that says they were more equipped than previously thought and that they had deals with Native Americans (they found a fossil of an Indian woman that seemed to be cooking for an English gentleman). Documents and archaeological records show that they were instructed to make a close relationship with the Indians.
Since the evidence shows that they faced rough climate conditions and a starving time Jeffery Sheler referenced Dennis Blanton (<em>co-author of the tree-ring study</em> ) who <em>suggested that </em><em>Jamestown colonists have been unfairly criticized</em> and <em>that even the best planned and supported colony would have been challenged under those conditions</em>, they were thought to have poor planning, poor support and indifference to their subsistence. It is now known that Indian reports of lack of food were not strategies but true records of feeding two populations in the drought.
Answer:
The Russian Revolution had the effect of putting an end to the major arena of fighting on the Eastern Front in World War I. It temporarily helped the Germans by freeing up troops, but this advantage did not do the Germans much good. Therefore, the revolution did not really end up making much of a difference in the outcome of the war.
Throughout WWI, the Germans were fighting a two-front war. They were fighting against France and England in the west and against Russia in the east. This meant, of course, that they had to divide their military strength between the two fronts. In 1918, the Bolsheviks concluded the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk with the Germans. Now, the Eastern Front no longer existed for the Germans. They could take their troops from that front and throw them into the Spring Offensive that started a few weeks later on the Western Front. This helped the Germans to some degree. However, the help that came from bringing the troops from the Eastern Front was negated by the influx of American troops since the US had finally started to get its military fully involved in the war by that time. Even with the movement of troops from the Eastern Front, the German offensive failed and the Germans lost the war.
Thus, the Russian Revolution did not change the outcome of the war. It changed some of the details of how the war played out, but it did not change the ultimate outcome.
Explanation:
heres the site https://www.enotes.com/homework-help/what-was-effect-russian-revolution-world-war1-461908
ANSWER: The Romans did it through gravity and the natural slope of the land.
The main cause of the French and Indian War is the superpower competition between Britain and France. ... The French and Indian War was fought between the two greatest powers on earth. The British and French had been rivals for a very long time in Europe. By 1754, the rivalry had followed them to North America.
