Answer:
Minimize harm because the protester might be affected by the interview.
Seek truth because the protester made a statement about a major issue.
Explanation:
The SPJ Code of Ethics is a guide that encourages journalists to take responsibility for the information they provide. It is not a strict set of rules, but it's important either way because some basic principles need to be followed in sensitive cases, such as this one.
As the protester is a minor, she needs to be protected. That's why the harm should be minimized as much as it's possible. But, at the same time, there is a possibility that the mother is not telling the truth. It is understandable that she may not want her daughter to be exposed, but the truth matters. If the protester is aware of the fact her face may be on television and wants to be heard, it should be alright to air the interview. After all, she spoke about an important issue. That's why the reporter should seek the truth and then try making the right decision.
Thus, the correct options are the last two.
You forgot to add a story to the question... I would gladly help you tho ;)
Answer:
Explanation:
It just means that you have to choose one quote, write about a book you've read from that perspective and talk about how it applies to something else you've read. Use details from that book. When I have a question like this I usually just ask my teacher because they know best. Ask your teacher(email because they are always there to help).
