Answer:
this one`s been up for debate for awhile now.
1. it depends on the organism
learning about an organism could be considered 'easier' to study in different ways. for example, if you are studying marine life, you will most likely have to keep it in a water habitat to watch it alive. If you are studying a land species, then watching from it`s natural habitat will give you more accurate results. sometimes the environment can affect an organisms internal systems more than you may think. this leads into my second point.
2. it depends on what you are trying to study
if you are trying to learn about the mating process, seasonal activity, migration, or external behavior, then monitoring it from it`s natural habitat or an area that is a close copy is your best option. but if you are looking into studying internal organs/systems or cells, then in <em>most</em> cases, the organism will need to be taken out of its natural habitat. only in very careful situations is it left in a habitat during examination.
Answer:
Excuse me, but there is no picture.
Explanation:
I’m not sure but I think is the answer C
Answer: The results will tell us about the correctness of hypothesis.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Hypothesis is that explanation which is used as a starting of any investigation. The Hypothesis can or cannot be correct. We can test the hypothesis with scientific research.
Now a student can make conclusions about the hypothesis based on the results obtained. If results are the same as the hypothesis it means that our proposed explanation i.e hypothesis was correct but if the result differs than it means the hypothesis was not correct.