Answer:
The industry nowadays is shifting from the more developed countries to less developed countries.
Explanation:
A is not correct because the less developed countries didn't really have any industry to start with, let alone for it to shift to another place from them.
B is not correct because the industry has been moving with the process of globalization, thus it has been shifting for some time now to the global markets.
C is correct because the industry from the more developed countries has seen a great opportunity and potential for making more profit in the less developed countries, and the reason for that is cheaper labor force, cheaper materials, and lower taxes.
D is not correct because these two regions are pretty much on the same level when it comes to industry, so there wouldn't really make any sense that it shifts from one to another.
I think Basic income systems that are financed by the profits of publicly owned<span> enterprises (often called </span>social dividend<span>, also known as </span>citizen's dividend<span>) are major components in many proposed models of </span>market socialism.<span> Basic income schemes have also been promoted within the context of </span>capitalist<span> systems, where they would be financed through various forms of taxation. Hope I helped!!</span>
We can immediately reject option D - while Spanish is an Indo-European language, Quechua is an indigenous language of the Americas.
The Spanish conquerors did not care much about the indigenous population - except if they could covert them, which would make them be seen as defenders of the Christian faith and win them favours with the Pope.
So they would not teach the indigenous population in secular schools, they would however, try to teach them religion. The correct answer is A - The Catholic clergy believed that Christianity would be adopted faster if translated into an indigenous language.
Answer:
light
Explanation:
it's a process call photosynthesis in which light is converted into nutrients
<span>218,134,692 people had internet access in 2009 which was 71% of the USA.
Hope this helps! </span>
