<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, the best option by far is that he was a "ruthless leader who often killed and/or sent away those who disagreed with him". He knew that the USSR was a very new and fragile entity that needed to be protected relentlessly. </span>
The answer would most likely be the The Constitution
Answer:
The government was powerless and society could collapse.
Answer:
The answer is explained below.
Explanation:
Booker T. Washington was a slave, after getting his freedom he dedicated himself to impart vocational teaching to the black Americans, for him industrial jobs were more important for the Black Americans .
While Dubois was different as he never was a slave. He only experienced racism in south. He wanted the African Americans to learn liberal arts and believed that top ten percent of the people had the IQ to make change hence these people should make change. Washington wanted the blacks to accept segregation so that they could gain economic freedom by working in factories, he was more concerned about the economic status of the blacks.
while Dubois wanted not just the economic but also the political freedom for the African Americans. He was more progressive.
Individual rights must, at times, be sacrificed to promote the "common good". For the entire population to be protect people must allow certain incursions into their personal space and privacy.