1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
polet [3.4K]
3 years ago
7

Who was the most influential philosopher in Chinese history

History
2 answers:
vichka [17]3 years ago
6 0
<span>Confucius was a teacher and an influential Chinese philosopher. He was also a political figure famous for his known aphorisms and social interaction models. Confucius is not just known to Chinese people. He was known  worldwide for his golden rule: "Do not impose on others what you do not wish for yourself."  This guiding principle of life was taught by Confucius to his followers. </span>   His philosophy as an educator focuses on what he called “Six Arts”: Calligraphy, Archer, Computation, and Music, ritual and chariot-driving.


olchik [2.2K]3 years ago
5 0

Confucious


I took the quiz and it was correct.

You might be interested in
Under the U.S. court system, which court is the highest in the land?
irinina [24]
The Supreme Court is the highest court in the land
6 0
3 years ago
Answer these facts about the titanic
hichkok12 [17]

Explanation:

1. Millvina Dean

Margaret Brown

Lillian Asplund

2. Edith Haisman

3. 825 tons of coal (per day)

4. Millvina Dean

5. 16

6 0
3 years ago
Gary is involved in ______ communication with steve l
o-na [289]

Gary is involved in a Negative/Careless communication with his father.

7 0
3 years ago
The U.S. Constitution makes no mention of a right to privacy. Should it be amended to affirm such a right? If so, how should the
IrinaK [193]

Answer: As others have noted, the “right to privacy” has virtually no Constitutional textual basis. The Justices in Griswold v Connecticut couldn’t even agree to which parts of the Constitution they could point to, and ended up saying it was some short of vague “penumbra of an emanation” of the Bill of Rights, but couldn’t explain what that meant or on what specific text it was based. The “right of privacy” was concocted out of thin air, in the shadows, by a SCOTUS coterie which wanted to protect people’s right to use contraceptives in their homes, but couldn't find any legitimate Constitutional basis to proclaim such a right. So they made it up. The right action by SCOTUS would have been to acknowledge that the Federal Government has no jurisdiction over contraception or abortion, those not being enumerated to the Federal Government by the Constitution and therefore denied to it by the 10th Amendment. SCOTUS should have sent the matter back to the States and directed all Federal Courts to but out. But it didn’t, leading to all the confusion and controversy that has ensued.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
How does the declaration of "state of emergency", "martial law" and other extraordinary measures allowed by the Constitution and
Feliz [49]

Answer: The declaration of "state of emergency", "martial law" and other extraordinary measures is allowed by the Constitution because The National Emergencies Act is a United States federal law passed to end all previous national emergencies and to formalize the emergency powers of the President. The Act empowers the President to activate special powers during a crisis but imposes certain procedural formalities when invoking such powers.

Explanation:

This proclamation was within the limits of the act that established the United States Shipping Board. The first president to declare a national emergency was President Lincoln, during the American Civil War, when he believed that the United States itself was coming to an end, and presidents asserted the power to declare emergencies without limiting their scope or duration, without citing the relevant statutes, and without congressional oversight. The Supreme Court in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer limited what a president could do in such an emergency, but did not limit the emergency declaration power itself. It was due in part to concern that a declaration of "emergency" for one purpose should not invoke every possible executive emergency power, that Congress in 1976 passed the National Emergencies Act.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How much truth is in freuds civilization and its discontents?
    6·1 answer
  • The oil spill resulting from the 2010 deepwater horizon disaster ________.
    10·1 answer
  • Why were the debates in Congress centered on territories in the West
    12·1 answer
  • 12. Describe an implied power of Congress and provide example.​
    11·1 answer
  • A(n) _________ is the succession of rulers from the same family
    6·1 answer
  • Can someone please help me answer this question! Hurry pleaseee!
    6·1 answer
  • What is the process by which a bill becomes law?
    8·1 answer
  • What british prime minister divided canada into two parts?
    10·1 answer
  • How did the treaty of paris change the relationship of the former colonies to other nations?
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following BEST describes a problem Plains farmers faced because of the climate?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!